Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 28;9(10):1281.
doi: 10.3390/plants9101281.

Genome-Wide Identification of Barley ABC Genes and Their Expression in Response to Abiotic Stress Treatment

Affiliations

Genome-Wide Identification of Barley ABC Genes and Their Expression in Response to Abiotic Stress Treatment

Ziling Zhang et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters (ABC transporters) participate in various plant growth and abiotic stress responses. In the present study, 131 ABC genes in barley were systematically identified using bioinformatics. Based on the classification method of the family in rice, these members were classified into eight subfamilies (ABCA-ABCG, ABCI). The conserved domain, amino acid composition, physicochemical properties, chromosome distribution, and tissue expression of these genes were predicted and analyzed. The results showed that the characteristic motifs of the barley ABC genes were highly conserved and there were great diversities in the homology of the transmembrane domain, the number of exons, amino acid length, and the molecular weight, whereas the span of the isoelectric point was small. Tissue expression profile analysis suggested that ABC genes possess non-tissue specificity. Ultimately, 15 differentially expressed genes exhibited diverse expression responses to stress treatments including drought, cadmium, and salt stress, indicating that the ABCB and ABCG subfamilies function in the response to abiotic stress in barley.

Keywords: ABC gene family; abiotic stress; barley; gene expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unrooted Neighbor-Joining tree constructed with ABC proteins of Hordeum vulgare L. (HORVV) and Oryza sativa L. (ORYSJ). The domains clustered into eight subgroups (ABCA-ABCG, ABCI). Different colored shadings indicated eight ABC transporter subfamilies. The red branch is barley, and the black branch is rice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mapping of the HvABC genes on Hordeum vulgare L. chromosomes. The chromosome number is indicated at the top of each chromosome. Three putative HvABC genes could not be localized on a specific chromosome.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conserve amino acid in seven motifs of ABC gene family in barley. Motif analysis and the sequence logos was performed using MEME website.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heatmap showing the expression pattern of HvABC genes in developmental stages and tissues, including ROO1 (Roots from seedings), ROO2 (Roots), LEA (Shoots from seedings), ETI (Etiolated seeding, dark cond), INF2 (Developing inflorescences), PAL (Dissected inflorescences), LEM/LOD/RAC (inflorescences, lemma/lodicule/rachis), NOD (Developing tillers), CAR5/CAR15 (Developing grain, 5 DAP/15 DAP), EPI (Epidermal strips), SEN (Senescing leaves). The combined phylogenetic trees of HvABCs genes on the left panel. The scale bar at the top represents relative expression value. Red denotes high expression levels, and green denotes low expression levels.
Figure 5
Figure 5
qRT-PCR analysis of 15 HvABC genes in response to (A) 50 μmol·L−1 CdCl2 (B) 200 mmol·L−1 NaCl (C) 20% PEG6000. columns in black represent CK, columns in gray represent abiotic stress. ANOVA and LSD was used to test significance. Asterisks indicate the corresponding gene significantly up- or down-regulated compared with the untreated control (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001) Data are the means of three replicates with standard errors represented by bars.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Higgins C.F., Linton K.J. The ATP switch model for ABC transporters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:918–926. doi: 10.1038/nsmb836. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davidson A.L., Dassa E., Orelle C., Chen J. Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:317–364. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane T.S., Rempe C.S., Davitt J., Staton M.E., Peng Y., Soltis D.E., Melkonian M., Deyholos M., Leebens-Mack J.H., Chase M. Diversity of ABC transporter genes across the plant kingdom and their potential utility in biotechnology. BMC Biotechnol. 2017;16:47. doi: 10.1186/s12896-016-0277-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Y.Q., Zhao Y.F. Structure and mechanism of ABC transporter. Chin. Bull. Life Sci. 2017;29:223–229.
    1. Jasinski M., Ducos E., Martinoia E., Boutry M. The ATP-binding cassette transporters: Structure, function and gene family comparison between rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1169. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.014720. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources