Contexts of reception, post-disaster migration, and socioeconomic mobility

Abstract

Current theories conceptualize return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina as an individual-level assessment of costs and benefits. Since relocation is cost prohibitive, return migration is thought to be unlikely for vulnerable populations. However, recent analyses of longitudinal survey data suggest that these individuals are likely to return to New Orleans over time despite achieving socioeconomic gains in the post-disaster location. I extend the "context of reception" approach from the sociology of immigration and draw on longitudinal data from the Resilience in the Survivors of Katrina Project to demonstrate how institutional, labor market, and social contexts influence the decision to return. Specifically, I show how subjective comparisons of the three contexts between origin and destination, perceived experiences of discrimination within each context, and changing contexts over time explain my sample's divergent migration and mobility outcomes. I conclude with implications for future research on, and policy responses to, natural disasters.

Keywords: Contexts of reception; Hurricane Katrina; Mixed methodology; Natural disasters; Post-disaster migration; Socioeconomic mobility; Vulnerable populations.

Fig. 1

Prevalence of institutional, labor market, and social dimensions underlying respondents’ post-disaster migration decisions in rounds 1 and 2 of interviews, by migration status (N = 100)

Fig. 2

Prevalence of institutional, labor market, and social dimensions underlying respondents’ post-disaster migration decisions in round 1 and round 1 follow-up interviews, by interview wave (N = 20)