Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 21;20(2-3):305-314.
doi: 10.1080/15532739.2018.1528196. eCollection 2019.

Predictive validity of the genderqueer identity scale (GQI): differences between genderqueer, transgender and cisgender sexual minority individuals

Jory M Catalpa  1 , Jenifer K McGuire  1 , Jessica N Fish  1 , G Nic Rider  1 , Nova Bradford  1 , Dianne Berg  1
Affiliations

Predictive validity of the genderqueer identity scale (GQI): differences between genderqueer, transgender and cisgender sexual minority individuals

Jory M Catalpa et al. Int J Transgend. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Genderqueer Identity Scale (GQI; McGuire et al., this issue) - a newly developed and validated measure - assesses genderqueer identity via four subscales: challenging the gender binary, the extent to which participants actively work to dismantle gender binaries in identity and expression); social construction of gender, or the degree to which participants interpret their gender identity as something that develops versus an innate essentialist phenomenon; theoretical awareness of gender, the degree of social and political intention attached to gender identity; and gender fluidity, or repeated shifting of gender expression across periods of time. Aim: This descriptive study examined the predictive validity of the GQI and group differences in genderqueer identity with a sample of transgender, genderqueer and nonbinary spectrum, and cisgender sexual minority adults (N = 510). Methods: We hypothesized that Genderqueer Non-binary (GQNB) participants would score higher on GQI subscale scores compared to transgender participants who identify within the gender binary. Results: Results from ANOVA models indicated a statistically significant difference in intrapersonal subscales across sexual minority and transgender binary or genderqueer groups. For the interpersonal subscales there were differences across all three groups. Cisgender sexual minority participants reported the lowest levels on all scales, while genderqueer participants reported the highest, and transgender binary were in-between. Discussion: The GQI demonstrates strong predictive validity in distinguishing binary transpersons from GQNB and cisgender sexual minority persons. Findings reveal that these three subgroups who might otherwise be similarly categorized (i.e., LGBTQ) show significant differences on challenging the binary, social construction, theoretical awareness, and gender fluidity constructs.

Keywords: Gender fluidity; genderqueer identity scale; nonbinary; transgender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Beek T. F., Kreukels B. P. C., Cohen-Kettenis P. T., & Steensma T. D (2015). Partial treatment requests and underlying motives of applicants for gender affirming interventions. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(11), 2201–2205. doi:10.1111/jsm.13033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bockting W. O. (2014). Transgender identity development In Tolman D. L. & Diamond L. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology, Vol. 1: Person-Based Approaches. (pp. 739–758). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14193-024 - DOI
    1. Bradford N. J., Rider G. N., Catalpa J. M., Morrow Q. J., Berg D. R., Spencer K. G., & McGuire J. K (2018). Creating gender: A thematic analysis of genderqueer narratives. International Journal of Transgenderism. Advance Online Publication, 1. doi:10.1080/15532739.2018.14.74516 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buhrmester M., Kwang T., & Gosling S. D (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler J. (2006). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

LinkOut - more resources