Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;8(1-2):66-74.
doi: 10.1159/000508592. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

The Role of the Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting High-Risk Heart Score in Patients Admitted with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Affiliations

The Role of the Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting High-Risk Heart Score in Patients Admitted with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Elshaimaa Seaoud et al. Pulse (Basel). 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: For cardiologists, management of acute chest pain continues to be a challenge. Physicians struggle to avoid unnecessary admissions and at the same time not to miss high-risk patients needing urgent intervention. Therefore, diagnostic strategies focus on identifying patients in whom an acute coronary syndrome can be safely ruled out based on findings from history, physical examination, and early cardiac marker measurement. The HEART score, a clinical prediction rule, was developed to provide the clinician with a simple and reliable predictor of cardiac risk.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as independent laboratory biomarkers when associated with the HEART risk score.

Method: A cross-sectional study of 120 patients who attended the emergency department with acute chest pain. NLR and PLR were both measured. In addition, the HEART score was the valid instrument used in evaluating and risk stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group.

Results: There was a positive correlation between the HEART score and the mean PLR and NLR (p = 0.000*). PLR and NLR were found to be significantly higher in the high-risk HEART score group (p = 0.05 and 0.0001*, respectively). A PLR of 115.5 and above had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 78%, while an NLR of 3.95 and above had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 86% to detect high-risk HEART score patients.

Conclusion: PLR and NLR proved to be a useful tool to identify high-risk patients when validated against the HEART score.

Keywords: HEART score; Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; Platelet/lymphocyte ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating curve analysis showing the area under the curve for the PLR and NLR and their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing high-risk HEART score patients. Diagonal segments are produced by ties.

References

    1. Corcoran D, Grant P, Berry C. Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: risk scores, biomarkers and clinical judgment. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Sep;8:131–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16((6)):191–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gibson PH, Cuthbertson BH, Croal BL, Rae D, El-Shafei H, Gibson G, et al. Usefulness of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan;105((2)):186–91. - PubMed
    1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan;340((2)):115–26. - PubMed
    1. Palmerini T, Brener SJ, Mehran R, Dangas G, Genereux P, Riva DD, et al. Leukocyte count is a modulating factor for the mortality benefit of bivalirudin in ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6((5)):518–26. - PubMed