Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;83(1):315-330.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02131-x.

The metronome response task for measuring mind wandering: Replication attempt and extension of three studies by Seli et al

Thomas Anderson  1 , Rotem Petranker  2 , Hause Lin  3 , Norman A S Farb  4
Affiliations

The metronome response task for measuring mind wandering: Replication attempt and extension of three studies by Seli et al

Thomas Anderson et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Science requires replicable tools to measure its intended constructs. Attention research has developed tools that have been used in mind-wandering research, but mind-wandering measures often rely on response-inhibition, which introduces speed-accuracy trade-offs that may conflate errors for mind-wandering. We sought to replicate three studies that used an improved mind-wandering measure: the Metronome Response Task (MRT). In a large (N=300) multisite sample, the primary MRT finding was replicated, showing that continuous rhythmic response time variability reliably predicted self-reported mind-wandering. Our findings also show previously undetected differences between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering. While previously reported mediators (motivation) and moderators (confidence) did not replicate, additional covariates add predictive value and additional constructs (e.g., boredom, effort) demonstrate convergent validity. The MRT is useful for inducing and measuring mind-wandering and provides an especially replicable tool. The MRT's measurement of attention could support future models of the complete cycle of sustained attention.

Keywords: Attention; Behavioural; Boredom; Continuous performance task; Mind-wandering; Variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, T., Lin, H., & Petranker, R. (2017). Preregistration of Replication of Seli et al 2013 “Wandering Minds and Wavering Rhythms.” https://osf.io/5mbda
    1. Bastian, M., & Sackur, J. (2013). Mind wandering at the fingertips: Automatic parsing of subjective states based on response time variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00573
    1. Cheyne, J. A., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheyne, J. A., Solman, G. J. F., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 111(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009
    1. Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: A dynamic framework. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(11), 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.113 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources