Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;57(6):2047-2056.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00921-4.

The Enduring Case for Fertility Desires

Affiliations

The Enduring Case for Fertility Desires

Sara Yeatman et al. Demography. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Persistently high levels of unintended fertility, combined with evidence that over- and underachieved fertility are typical and not exceptional, have prompted researchers to question the utility of fertility desires writ large. In this study, we elaborate this paradox: widespread unintendedness and meaningful, highly predictive fertility desires can and do coexist. Using data from Malawi, we demonstrate the predictive validity of numeric fertility timing desires over both four-month and one-year periods. We find that fertility timing desires are highly predictive of pregnancy and that they follow a gradient wherein the likelihood of pregnancy decreases in correspondence with desired time to next birth. This finding holds despite the simultaneous observation of high levels of unintended pregnancy in our sample. Discordance between desires and behaviors reflects constraints to achieving one's fertility and the fluidity of desires but not their irrelevance. Fertility desires remain an essential-if sometimes blunt-tool in the demographers' toolkit.

Keywords: Fertility; Fertility desires; Malawi.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between desired timing of next birth and subsequent pregnancy over four months and over one year
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Odds ratios (ORs) of pregnancy within four months and within one year for women desiring a pregnancy in the corresponding time frame versus women desiring to delay. Results of 10 logistic regression models across three analytic samples (full sample, married women only, unmarried women only). Solid lines indicate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around unadjusted odds ratios of pregnancy within a given time frame by a stated desire to be pregnant within that time. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals around adjusted ORs from models that include controls for age, years of education, parity, marital status (full sample only), and having had a birth in the past year. Unmarried women are excluded from the top panel because the small number of unmarried women (n = 6) who reported a desire for pregnancy as soon as possible predicted failure perfectly.

References

    1. Aiken AR, Borrero S, Callegari LS, & Dehlendorf C (2016). Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: Unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 147–151. 10.1363/48e10316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, & Sedgh G (2018). Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: Estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Global Health, 6, e380–e389. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bongaarts J (1992). Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 102–108.
    1. Bongaarts J (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and DevelopmentReview, 27, 260–281.
    1. Casterline J, & Han S (2017). Unrealized fertility: Fertility desires at the end of the reproductive career. Demographic Research, 36, 427–454. 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.14 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources