Biglycan and chondroitin sulfate play pivotal roles in bone toughness via retaining bound water in bone mineral matrix
- PMID: 33002580
- PMCID: PMC7722036
- DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.09.002
Biglycan and chondroitin sulfate play pivotal roles in bone toughness via retaining bound water in bone mineral matrix
Abstract
Recent in vitro evidence shows that glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and proteoglycans (PGs) in bone matrix may functionally be involved in the tissue-level toughness of bone. In this study, we showed the effect of biglycan (Bgn), a small leucine-rich proteoglycan enriched in extracellular matrix of bone and the associated GAG subtype, chondroitin sulfate (CS), on the toughness of bone in vivo, using wild-type (WT) and Bgn deficient mice. The amount of total GAGs and CS in the mineralized compartment of Bgn KO mouse bone matrix decreased significantly, associated with the reduction of the toughness of bone, in comparison with those of WT mice. However, such differences between WT and Bgn KO mice diminished once the bound water was removed from bone matrix. In addition, CS was identified as the major subtype in bone matrix. We then supplemented CS to both WT and Bgn KO mice to test whether supplemental GAGs could improve the tissue-level toughness of bone. After intradermal administration of CS, the toughness of WT bone was greatly improved, with the GAGs and bound water amount in the bone matrix increased, while such improvement was not observed in Bgn KO mice or with supplementation of dermatan sulfate (DS). Moreover, CS supplemented WT mice exhibited higher bone mineral density and reduced osteoclastogenesis. Interestingly, Bgn KO bone did not show such differences irrespective of the intradermal administration of CS. In summary, the results of this study suggest that Bgn and CS in bone matrix play a pivotal role in imparting the toughness to bone most likely via retaining bound water in bone matrix. Moreover, supplementation of CS improves the toughness of bone in mouse models.
Keywords: Biglycan; Bone matrix; Bone toughness; Bound water; Chondroitin sulfate.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures








References
-
- Alho A, Husby T, Hoiseth A, Bone mineral content and mechanical strength. An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy, Clinical orthopaedics and related research 227 (1988) 292–7. - PubMed
-
- Aspray TJ, Prentice A, Cole TJ, Sawo Y, Reeve J, Francis RM, Low bone mineral content is common but osteoporotic fractures are rare in elderly rural Gambian women, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 11(7) (1996)1019–25. - PubMed
-
- McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM, Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 75(8) (1993) 1193–205. - PubMed
-
- Weiner S, Traub W, Bone structure: from angstroms to microns, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 6(3) (1992) 879–85. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous