Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;27(6):353-359.
doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000615.

Immunometabolism in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and adoptive cellular therapies

Affiliations
Review

Immunometabolism in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and adoptive cellular therapies

Erica L Braverman et al. Curr Opin Hematol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Controlling T cell activity through metabolic manipulation has become a prominent feature in immunology and practitioners of both adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have utilized metabolic interventions to control T cell function. This review will survey recent metabolic research efforts in HSCT and ACT to paint a broad picture of immunometabolism and highlight advances in each area.

Recent findings: In HSCT, recent publications have focused on modifying reactive oxygen species, sirtuin signalling or the NAD salvage pathway within alloreactive T cells and regulatory T cells. In ACT, metabolic interventions that bolster memory T cell development, increase mitochondrial density and function, or block regulatory signals in the tumour microenvironment (TME) have recently been published.

Summary: Metabolic interventions control immune responses. In ACT, efforts seek to improve the in-vivo metabolic fitness of T cells, while in HSCT energies have focused on blocking alloreactive T cell expansion or promoting regulatory T cells. Methods to identify new, metabolically targetable pathways, as well as the ability of metabolic biomarkers to predict disease onset and therapeutic response, will continue to advance the field towards clinically applicable interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None

References

    1. Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG: Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2011, 27:441–464. - PubMed
    1. Geltink RIK, Kyle RL, Pearce EL: Unraveling the complex interplay between T cell metabolism and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol 2018, 36:461–488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coe DJ, Kishore M, Marelli-Berg F: Metabolic regulation of regulatory T cell development and function. Front. Immunol 2014, 5:590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma EH, Verway MJ, Johnson RM, Roy DG, Steadman M, Hayes S, Williams KS, Sheldon RD, Samborska B, Kosinski PA, et al. : Metabolic profiling using stable isotope tracing reveals distinct patterns of glucose utilization by physiologically activated CD8+ T cells. Immunity 2019, 51:856–870.e5. - PubMed
    2. This paper supports the long-held belief that in vitro T cell metabolism does not necessarily reflect in vivo metabolic adaptations and highlighted an increased role for oxidative metabolism in vivo in recently activated CD8 T cells.

    1. Allocco JB, Alegre M-L: In vivo and in vitro differences in CD8+ T cell metabolism. Am. J. Transplant 2020, 20:327.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances