Qualitative exploration of health professionals' experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results for nine conditions in England
- PMID: 33004391
- PMCID: PMC7534703
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037081
Qualitative exploration of health professionals' experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results for nine conditions in England
Abstract
Objective: To explore health professionals' experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results, highlight differences, share good practice and make recommendations for future research.
Design: Qualitative exploratory design was employed using semi-structured interviews SETTING: Three National Health Service provider organisations in England PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen health professionals involved in communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents for all nine conditions currently included in the newborn bloodspot screening programme in England.
Results: Findings indicated variation in approaches to communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents, largely influenced by resources available and the lack of clear guidance. Health professionals emphasised the importance of communicating results to families in a way that is sensitive to their needs. However, many challenges hindered communication including logistical considerations; difficulty contacting the family and other health professionals; language barriers; parental reactions; resource considerations; lack of training; and insufficient time.
Conclusion: Health professionals invest a lot of time and energy trying to ensure communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to families is done well. However, there continues to be great variation in the way these results are communicated to parents and this is largely influenced by resources available but also the lack of concrete guidance. How best to support health professionals undertaking this challenging and emotive task requires further exploration. We recommend evaluation of a more cohesive approach that meets the needs of parents and staff while being sensitive to the subtleties of each condition.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN15330120.
Keywords: cystic fibrosis; e.g. iron; genetics; haematology; other metabolic; paediatrics; porphyria.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.J Particip Med. 2022 Jul 27;14(1):e33485. doi: 10.2196/33485. J Particip Med. 2022. PMID: 35896023 Free PMC article.
-
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e050773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34452966 Free PMC article.
-
Co-designed strategies for delivery of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents: the ReSPoND mixed-methods study.Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Jul. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Jul. PMID: 35881727 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Processing of positive newborn screening results: a qualitative exploration of current practice in England.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e044755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044755. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33310815 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Impact of NBS for CF.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar 30;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020027. eCollection 2020 Jun. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020. PMID: 33073024 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic Newborn Screening Result in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Exploratory Study of the General Practitioner's Perspective.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 Aug 8;11(3):62. doi: 10.3390/ijns11030062. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025. PMID: 40843904 Free PMC article.
-
Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective.Nutrients. 2022 Sep 23;14(19):3961. doi: 10.3390/nu14193961. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36235614 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;11(5):507. doi: 10.3390/children11050507. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38790502 Free PMC article.
-
Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.J Particip Med. 2022 Jul 27;14(1):e33485. doi: 10.2196/33485. J Particip Med. 2022. PMID: 35896023 Free PMC article.
-
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e050773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34452966 Free PMC article.
References
-
- UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre Health professional Handbook: a guide to newborn blood spot screening for healthcare professionals. London: UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, 2012: 1–56.
-
- Public Health England Newborn blood spot screening programme in the UK: data collection and performance analysis report 2016 to 2017. London, 2018: 1–65.
-
- Public Health England Nhs sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme data report 2015/16: trends and performance analysis. London, 2017: 1–81.
-
- Public Health England Newborn blood spot screening: programme Handbook: public health England, 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous