Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;15(3):207-214.
doi: 10.5114/pg.2020.91501. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

Liver metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours - treatment methods

Affiliations
Review

Liver metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours - treatment methods

Paweł Gut. Prz Gastroenterol. 2020.

Abstract

Surgical approaches that allow the safe treatment of multiple, bilateral, large tumours, and that combine extirpative, ablative and interventional therapies, have expanded the population of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) liver metastases (LMs) who can benefit from aggressive treatment of their liver disease. Pre-treatment staging often includes the biochemical assessment of serologic markers such as serotonin, insulin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and chromogranin, even in patients without clinically apparent hormonal excess. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a technique that involves the use of thermal energy to induce coagulation necrosis, thereby destroying tumour cells. Resection plus RFA is increasingly used in patients with bilateral NET LMs. Resection is performed for large or dominant lesions, while ablation is used to treat small lesions. Hepatic arterial embolization, typically termed transarterial embolization, and transarterial chemoembolization have been shown to induce a reduction in tumour size and to ameliorate symptoms of excess hormonal secretion.

Keywords: gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours; liver metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDermott EW, Guduric B, Brennan MF. Prognostic variables in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1007-9. - PubMed
    1. Norton JA, Kivlen M, Li M, et al. . Morbidity and mortality of aggressive resection in patients with advances neuroendocrine tumors. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 859-66. - PubMed
    1. Godwin JD. Carcinoid tumors. An analysis of 2,837 cases. Cancer 1975; 36: 560-9. - PubMed
    1. Zeitels J, Naunheim K, Kaplan EL, et al. . Carcinoid tumors: a 37-year experience. Arch Surg 1982; 117: 732-7. - PubMed
    1. Jensen RT. Natural history of digestive endocrine tumours. In: Recent Advances in the Pathophysiology and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Digestive Endocrine Tumours. Colombel JF, Mignon M (eds.). John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, France 1999; 192-219.