Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Sep 29:78:88.
doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00467-2. eCollection 2020.

History and development of national burden of disease assessment in Australia

Affiliations
Editorial

History and development of national burden of disease assessment in Australia

Lynelle Moon et al. Arch Public Health. .

Abstract

Australia's 1996 national burden of disease (BoD) study was one of the first in the world and updates have continued over the following two decades with the fifth study now underway. The studies adapt the global framework most recently implemented by the Global Burden of Disease Study and the World Health Organization to suit Australia's specific needs, producing estimates of fatal and non-fatal burden via the Disability Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, as well as attribution of the burden to many risk factors. Detailed Australian data are used with minimal reliance on modelling to fill data gaps. Comprehensive estimates are produced, including for the Indigenous population, for each of the eight states and territories, the five remoteness areas and five socioeconomic quintiles. A number of method developments have been made as part of these studies, including redistribution of deaths data and a detailed quality framework for describing the robustness of the underlying data and methods. Data and methods continue to be refined as part of the studies, and developments in global studies and other national studies are incorporated where appropriate.

Keywords: Australia; Burden; DALY; Deaths; Disease; Method; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Global and national Australian studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C. The burden of disease and injury in Australia (1996). Cat. No. PHE 17. Canberra: AIHW; 1999.
    1. Lozano R, Murray CJL, Frenk J, Bobadilla JL. Burden of disease assessment and health system reform: results of a study in Mexico. J Int Dev. 1995;7(3):555–563. doi: 10.1002/jid.3380070314. - DOI
    1. Melse JM, Essink-Bot M-L, Kramers PGN, Hoeymans N, on behalf of the Dutch Burden of Disease Group A national burden of disease calculation: Dutch disability-adjusted life-years. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1241–1247. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1241. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1(2):e114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AIHW . Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015. Australian burden of disease series no. 19. Cat. No. BOD 22. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources