Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 21;4(5):498-504.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12365. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review

Affiliations
Review

Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review

Souya Nunobe et al. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. .

Abstract

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function-preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double-flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double-tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.

Keywords: gastric cancer; proximal gastrectomy; reconstruction method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. Author Contributions: (I) conception and design: S Nunobe; (II) administrative support: S Nunobe; (III) provision of study materials or patients: all authors; (IV) collection and assembly of data: S Nunobe; (V) data analysis and interpretation: S Nunobe; (VI) manuscript writing: all authors; (VII) final approval of manuscript: all authors.

References

    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2020. 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X. Function‐preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2683–92. - PubMed
    1. Nomura E, Okajima K. Function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5888–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long‐term quality‐of‐life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS‐45): a nationwide multiinstitutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:407–16. - PubMed
    1. Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Fukagawa T. Long‐term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:558–62. - PubMed