Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
- PMID: 33005844
- PMCID: PMC7511558
- DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12365
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
Abstract
Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function-preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double-flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double-tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.
Keywords: gastric cancer; proximal gastrectomy; reconstruction method.
© 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interests: There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. Author Contributions: (I) conception and design: S Nunobe; (II) administrative support: S Nunobe; (III) provision of study materials or patients: all authors; (IV) collection and assembly of data: S Nunobe; (V) data analysis and interpretation: S Nunobe; (VI) manuscript writing: all authors; (VII) final approval of manuscript: all authors.
References
-
- Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X. Function‐preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2683–92. - PubMed
-
- Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long‐term quality‐of‐life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS‐45): a nationwide multiinstitutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:407–16. - PubMed
-
- Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Fukagawa T. Long‐term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:558–62. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
