Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer
- PMID: 33006031
- PMCID: PMC8346387
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07979-6
Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic strategies to suppress local recurrence, including lateral lymph node metastasis, are important to improve the curability of rectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to clarify the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (RALLD), comparing its short-term outcomes with those of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (LLLD). There are some retrospective reports comparing RALLD or LLLD and open lateral lymph node dissection (OLLD), but few reports comparing RALLD and LLND to each other.
Methods: From November 2014 to August 2020, we compared the short-term outcomes in 40 patients who underwent RALLD and 55 patients who underwent LLLD.
Results: The total operative time was significantly longer in the RALLD group than in the LLLD group (p < 0.001). However, lateral dissection time was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.661). The postoperative hospital time was shorter in the RALLD group than in the LLLD group (p < 0.048). No significant differences were identified in the rates of postoperative bleeding, incisional surgical site infection (SSI), organ/space SSI, urinary disfunction, urinary infection, or small bowel obstruction between the groups. However, anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the RALLD group than in the LLLD group (p = 0.031).
Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of RALLD indicate it is feasible, and RALLD may be a useful modality for lower rectal cancer.
Keywords: Lateral lymph node dissection; Rectal cancer; Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
© 2020. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hajime Morohashi, Yoshiyuki Sakamoto, Takuya Miura, Takuji Kagiya, Kenta Ogasawara, Yoshiya Takahashi, Kentaro Sato, Yutaro Hara, Hirokazu Ogasawara, and Kenichi Hakamada have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):721-728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4266-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26092002
-
Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4498-4505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x. Epub 2018 May 2. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29721748
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection of advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study comparing short-term outcomes.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):579-587. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02818-x. Epub 2023 May 8. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37157049
-
Lateral lymph node dissection in advanced low rectal cancer treatment.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2361-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03975-x. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 34152455 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6464-6475. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39269481
Cited by
-
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted comparative laparoscopic surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5584-5595. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11111-3. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39090200
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes.Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;8(3):e70174. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70174. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025. PMID: 40052270 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3520-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10901-z. Epub 2024 May 30. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38816620
-
Efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection for local control of rectal cancer: A multicenter study.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Mar 12;8(4):631-638. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12789. eCollection 2024 Jul. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024. PMID: 38957561 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study at two institutions.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4403-4413. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09925-8. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36757452 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2485–2493. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–278. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1448. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources