Lung ultrasound compared with bedside chest radiography in a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit
- PMID: 33006781
- DOI: 10.1111/apa.15605
Lung ultrasound compared with bedside chest radiography in a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit
Abstract
Aim: Postoperative recovery of children with heart disease is encumbered by pulmonary complications like pneumothorax (PNX), pleural effusion (PLE), interstitial oedema and pulmonary consolidation (PC). Recently, lung ultrasound (LUS) has become an important diagnostic tool for evaluation of pulmonary diseases in the paediatric context. LUS is accurate in diagnosing pleural and parenchymal diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of LUS in the identification of PNX, PLE and PC in a paediatric population of patients with congenital heart disease after heart surgery.
Methods: Fifty-three patients aged 0-17 years who underwent cardiac surgery were evaluated in the postoperative period by chest X-ray (CXR) and LUS at the same time. The methods where compared for recognition of PNX, PLE and PC.
Results: LUS showed a good agreement for PNX and a moderate agreement for both PLE and PC. LUS also showed a significantly superior relative sensitivity than CXR for PC and PLE and a significantly inferior relative sensitivity for PNX.
Conclusion: This study confirms that LUS has a sufficient agreement rate with the current clinical standard (CXR). Non-inferiority in diagnosis together with the easiness of bedside performance makes LUS a very attractive tool for the paediatric cardiac intensive care unit.
Keywords: cardiac surgery; congenital heart disease; lung ultrasound; paediatric intensive care; pulmonary dysfunction.
© 2020 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Letter to 'Lung Ultrasound compared with bedside chest radiography in a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit'.Acta Paediatr. 2021 Apr;110(4):1375. doi: 10.1111/apa.15665. Epub 2020 Dec 18. Acta Paediatr. 2021. PMID: 33185921 No abstract available.
-
Response from the authors: How to compare point of care and traditional diagnostic tests minimising loss of information.Acta Paediatr. 2021 Apr;110(4):1376. doi: 10.1111/apa.15689. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Acta Paediatr. 2021. PMID: 33377235 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cantinotti M, Giordano R, Volpicelli G, et al. Lung ultrasound in adult and paediatric cardiac surgery: is it time for routine use? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(2):208-215.
-
- Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The, "lung point": an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(10):1434-1440.
-
- Lichtenstein D, van Hooland S, Elbers P, Malbrain ML. Ten good reasons to practice ultrasound in critical care. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(5):323-335.
-
- Ait-Ali L, Andreassi MG, Foffa I, Spadoni I, Vano E, Picano E. Cumulative patient effective dose and acute radiation-induced chromosomal DNA damage in children with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2010;96(4):269-274.
-
- Bouhemad B, Mongodi S, Via G, Rouquette I. Ultrasound for "lung monitoring" of ventilated patients. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):437-447.