Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30:11:222-229.
doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f64.690b.

A comparison of peer and faculty narrative feedback on medical student oral research presentations

Tracey A H Taylor  1 , Stephanie M Swanberg  1
Affiliations

A comparison of peer and faculty narrative feedback on medical student oral research presentations

Tracey A H Taylor et al. Int J Med Educ. .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this project was to evaluate and improve the oral presentation assessment component of a required research training curriculum at an undergraduate medical school by analyzing the quantity, quality, and variety of peer and faculty feedback on medical student oral research presentations.

Methods: We conducted a program evaluation of oral presentation assessments during the 2016 and 2017 academic years. Second-year medical students (n=225) provided oral presentations of their research and received narrative feedback from peers and faculty. All comments were inductively coded for themes and Chi-square testing compared faculty and peer feedback differences in quantity, quality, and variety, as well as changes in feedback between the initial and final presentations. Comparative analysis of student PowerPoint presentation files before and after receiving feedback was also conducted.

Results: Over two years, 2,617 peer and 498 faculty comments were collected and categorized into ten themes, with the top three being: presentation skills, visual presentation, and content. Both peers and judges favored providing positive over improvement comments, with peers tending to give richer feedback, but judges more diverse feedback. Nearly all presenters made some change from the initial to final presentations based on feedback.

Conclusions: Data from this analysis was used to restructure the oral presentation requirement for the students. Both peer and faculty formative feedback can contribute to developing medical student competence in providing feedback and delivering oral presentations. Future studies could assess student perceptions of this assessment to determine its value in developing communication skills.

Keywords: formative feedback; medical students; oral presentations; research training curricula; undergraduate medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of medical student research oral presentations over two years
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Accreditation Council for Education in Nutrition and Dietetics. Accreditation standards for nutrition and dietetics coordinated programs, 2017. [Cited 21 Jan 2020]; Available from: https://www.eatrightpro.org/acend/accreditation-standards-fees-and-polic....
    1. Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education. Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education standards and interpretive guide, 2018. [Cited 21 Jan 2020]; Available from: https://acoteonline.org/accreditation-explained/standards/. - PubMed
    1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice, 2008. [Cited 21 Jan 2020]; Available from: https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials. - PubMed
    1. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs, 2016. [Cited 21 Jan 2020]; Available from: http://www.capteonline.org/accreditationhandbook/.
    1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree, 2020. [Cited 21 Jan 2020]; Available from: http://lcme.org/publications/.