Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan;112(1):296-304.
doi: 10.1111/cas.14674. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Comprehensive genomic profiling for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Comprehensive genomic profiling for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced cancer

Tomohiro Kondo et al. Cancer Sci. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing by next-generation sequencing has been introduced into clinical practice as part of precision cancer medicine to select effective targeted therapies. However, whether CGP testing at the time of first-line chemotherapy could be clinically useful is not clear. We conducted this single-center, prospective, observational study to investigate the feasibility of CGP testing for chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage III/IV gastrointestinal cancer, rare cancer, and cancer of unknown primary, using the FoundationOne® companion diagnostic (F1CDx) assay. The primary outcome was the detection rate of at least one actionable/druggable cancer genomic alteration. Actionable/druggable cancer genomic alterations were determined by the F1CDx report. An institutional molecular tumor board determined the molecular-based recommended therapies. A total of 197 patients were enrolled from October 2018 to June 2019. CGP success rate was 76.6% (151 of 197 patients), and median turnaround time was 19 days (range: 10-329 days). Actionable and druggable cancer genomic alterations were reported in 145 (73.6%) and 124 (62.9%) patients, respectively. The highest detection rate of druggable genomic alterations in gastrointestinal cancers was 80% in colorectal cancer (48 of 60 patients). Molecular-based recommended therapies were determined in 46 patients (23.4%). CGP testing would be a useful tool for the identification of a potentially effective first-line chemotherapy.

Keywords: actionable genomic alteration; comprehensive genomic profiling; druggable genomic alteration; gastrointestinal cancer; precision cancer medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research received funding from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan. All authors received support for third‐party editorial assistance from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Atsushi Yamada and Taro Funakoshi belong to an endowed chair sponsored partly by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Masashi Kanai received lecture fees, honoraria, or other fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Manabu Muto received research funding and also lecture fees, honoraria, or other fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trial profile. Passed report was defined as reports with results of all items examined. Qualified report was defined as reports which may have reduced sensitivity when the specimen does not meet performance specifications. pts, patients; FFPE, formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Detection rate of actionable/druggable cancer genomic alterations and molecular‐based recommended therapies
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Frequency of representative druggable cancer genomic alterations. The vertical axis shows the list of representative druggable cancer genomic alterations categorized by the pathway analysis. The heatmap value represents the frequency of “number of druggable cancer genomic alterations” divided by “number of patients” in each cancer type. BTC, biliary tract cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; CUP, cancer of unknown primary; EC, esophageal cancer; GC, gastric cancer; GPCR, G protein–coupled receptor; MAPK, mitogen‐activated protein kinase; PC, pancreatic cancer; RC, rare cancer; TGF‐β, transforming growth factor beta.

References

    1. Haendel MA, Chute CG, Robinson PN. Classification, ontology, and precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1452‐1462. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23:703‐713. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kou T, Kanai M, Matsumoto S, Okuno Y, Muto M. The possibility of clinical sequencing in the management of cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:399‐406. - PubMed
    1. Kou T, Kanai M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Clinical sequencing using a next‐generation sequencing‐based multiplex gene assay in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1440‐1446. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sunami K, Ichikawa H, Kubo T, et al. Feasibility and utility of a panel testing for 114 cancer‐associated genes in a clinical setting: a hospital‐based study. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:1480‐1490. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances