Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec:101:138-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1464. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection fatality rates

Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz  1 , Lea Merone  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection fatality rates

Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

An important unknown during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the infection fatality rate (IFR). This differs from the case fatality rate (CFR) as an estimate of the number of deaths and as a proportion of the total number of cases, including those who are mild and asymptomatic. While the CFR is extremely valuable for experts, IFR is increasingly being called for by policy makers and the lay public as an estimate of the overall mortality from COVID-19.

Methods: Pubmed, Medline, SSRN, and Medrxiv were searched using a set of terms and Boolean operators on 25/04/2020 and re-searched on 14/05/2020, 21/05/2020 and 16/06/2020. Articles were screened for inclusion by both authors. Meta-analysis was performed in Stata 15.1 by using the metan command, based on IFR and confidence intervals extracted from each study. Google/Google Scholar was used to assess the grey literature relating to government reports.

Results: After exclusions, there were 24 estimates of IFR included in the final meta-analysis, from a wide range of countries, published between February and June 2020. The meta-analysis demonstrated a point estimate of IFR of 0.68% (0.53%-0.82%) with high heterogeneity (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence on COVID-19 until July 2020, the IFR of the disease across populations is 0.68% (0.53%-0.82%). However, due to very high heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, it is difficult to know if this represents a completely unbiased point estimate. It is likely that, due to age and perhaps underlying comorbidities in the population, different places will experience different IFRs due to the disease. Given issues with mortality recording, it is also likely that this represents an underestimate of the true IFR figure. More research looking at age-stratified IFR is urgently needed to inform policymaking on this front.

Keywords: COVID-19; Death rate; Global health; Infection-fatality rate; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
None
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aguas R., Corder R.M., King J.G., Goncalves G., Ferreira M.U., Gomes M.G.M. Herd immunity thresholds for SARS-CoV-2 estimated from unfolding epidemics. medRxiv. 2020 2020.07.23.20160762.
    1. Variation in false-negative rate of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based SARS-CoV-2 tests by time since exposure. Ann Intern Med; 0(0):null. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anon . Instituto de Salud Carlos III; 2020. ESTUDIO NACIONAL DE SERO-EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE LA INFECCIÓN POR SARS-COV-2 EN ESPAÑA.
    1. Anon . Czech Republic Ministry of Health; 2020. Collective immunity study SARS-COV-2-CZ-Preval: preliminary results.
    1. Anon . Finnish Government; Finland: 2020. Weekly Report of the Population Serology Survey of the Corona Epidemic.

MeSH terms