Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7153.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197153.

Association between Maternal Postpartum Depression, Stress, Optimism, and Breastfeeding Pattern in the First Six Months

Affiliations

Association between Maternal Postpartum Depression, Stress, Optimism, and Breastfeeding Pattern in the First Six Months

Andrea Gila-Díaz et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Early breastfeeding cessation is a major public health problem. Several factors can affect breastfeeding pattern, and psychological aspects have been poorly explored. We hypothesize that psychological factors and breastfeeding pattern have a relationship. We have assessed in mothers during the first six months of lactation if breastfeeding pattern is associated with maternal stress, postpartum depression, and dispositional optimism, and if these psychological factors play a role on breastfeeding adherence. In total, 711 women participated, answering online the following questionnaires: sociodemographic, perceived stress scale, Edinburgh postpartum depression scale, life orientation test, and breastfeeding adherence score. Women were categorized according to infant feeding practices as exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) or mixed breastfeeding (MBF). The EBF group had a lower score of perceived stress compared to those giving MBF (first month: EBF = 1.5 [1.1; 1.9], MBF = 1.8 [1.5; 2.0]; p-Value = 0.030; third month: EBF = 1.6 [1.2; 2.0], MBF = 1.8 [1.5; 2.4]; p-Value = 0.038) and also had a lower score of postpartum depression (third month: EBF = 8.0 [6.0; 11.0], MBF = 11.0 [9.0; 15.0]; p-Value = 0.001). The breastfeeding adherence score showed a positive correlation with maternal perceived stress (first month: ρ = 0.27; p-Value = 0.018), and postpartum depression (third month: ρ = 0.30; p-Value < 0.001), and a negative correlation with maternal dispositional optimism (second month: ρ = -0.20; p-Value = 0.028). MBF was positively associated with breastfeeding adherence score (odd ratio (OR) = 1.4 [1.2-1.6]; p-Value < 0.001) and with postpartum depression (OR = 1.1 [1.0; 1.1]; p-Value = 0.020). In the third month of breastfeeding, women with MBF exhibited higher perceive stress and postpartum depression compared to those with EBF and no difference in dispositional optimism. The maternal psychological aspects are associated with breastfeeding pattern. Evaluation of maternal psychological concerns and providing support to lactating mothers may help improving breastfeeding adherence.

Keywords: breastfeeding adherence; dispositional optimism; exclusive breastfeeding; perceived stress; postpartum depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart of the responses of the survey and sample size used in the study that match with the inclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of psychological factors during the breastfeeding period stratified by infant exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) or mixed breastfeeding (MBF). (A) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). (B) Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS). (C) Life Orientation Test (LOT). Data show median and interquartile range. Sample size is shown between brackets. The p-Value was obtained by Wilcoxon sum-rank test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of breastfeeding adherence score during the breastfeeding period stratified by infant exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) or mixed breastfeeding (MBF). Data show median and interquartile range. Sample size is shown between brackets. The p-Value was obtained by Wilcoxon sum-rank test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Exclusive Breastfeeding for Optimal Growth, Development and Health of Infants. [(accessed on 25 August 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/elena/titles/exclusive_breastfeeding/en/
    1. Ip S., Chung M., Raman G., Chew P., Magula N., DeVine D., Trikalinos T., Lau J. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 2007;153:1–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hauck F.R., Thompson J.M., Tanabe K.O., Moon R.Y., Vennemann M.M. Breastfeeding and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2011;128:103–110. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horta B.L., Loret de Mola C., Victora C.G. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:30–37. doi: 10.1111/apa.13133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amitay E.L., Keinan-Boker L. Breastfeeding and Childhood Leukemia Incidence: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:e151025. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1025. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types