Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30;25(19):4496.
doi: 10.3390/molecules25194496.

Mixed Amphiphilic Polymeric Nanoparticles of Chitosan, Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Poly(methyl methacrylate) for Intranasal Drug Delivery: A Preliminary In Vivo Study

Affiliations

Mixed Amphiphilic Polymeric Nanoparticles of Chitosan, Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Poly(methyl methacrylate) for Intranasal Drug Delivery: A Preliminary In Vivo Study

Inbar Schlachet et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Intranasal (i.n.) administration became an alternative strategy to bypass the blood-brain barrier and improve drug bioavailability in the brain. The main goal of this work was to preliminarily study the biodistribution of mixed amphiphilic mucoadhesive nanoparticles made of chitosan-g-poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl alcohol)-g-poly(methyl methacrylate) and ionotropically crosslinked with sodium tripolyphosphate in the brain after intravenous (i.v.) and i.n. administration to Hsd:ICR mice. After i.v. administration, the highest nanoparticle accumulation was detected in the liver, among other peripheral organs. After i.n. administration of a 10-times smaller nanoparticle dose, the accumulation of the nanoparticles in off-target organs was much lower than after i.v. injection. In particular, the accumulation of the nanoparticles in the liver was 20 times lower than by i.v. When brains were analyzed separately, intravenously administered nanoparticles accumulated mainly in the "top" brain, reaching a maximum after 1 h. Conversely, in i.n. administration, nanoparticles were detected in the "bottom" brain and the head (maximum reached after 2 h) owing to their retention in the nasal mucosa and could serve as a reservoir from which the drug is released and transported to the brain over time. Overall, results indicate that i.n. nanoparticles reach similar brain bioavailability, though with a 10-fold smaller dose, and accumulate in off-target organs to a more limited extent and only after redistribution through the systemic circulation. At the same time, both administration routes seem to lead to differential accumulation in brain regions, and thus, they could be beneficial in the treatment of different medical conditions.

Keywords: biodistribution; blood–brain barrier (BBB); central nervous system (CNS); intranasal delivery; self-assembled polymeric nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HR-SEM micrographs of mixed CS-g-PMMA:PVA-g-PMMA nanoparticles. (a) non-crosslinked and (b) TPP-crosslinked nanoparticles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Biodistribution of NIR-797-labeled crosslinked 0.1% w/v mixed CS-PMMA30:PVA-PMMA16 nanoparticles after (a) i.v. administration and (b) i.n. administration to Hsd:ICR mice (n = 3). The measurement was performed after organ dissection at each time point. Average fluorescence radiance was measured using Living Imaging analysis software. Bars represent the average of mice at each time point. The error bars are S.D. from the mean. Statistical comparisons are summarized in Table S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ex vivo analysis of the distribution of NIR-797-labeled crosslinked 0.1% w/v mixed CS-PMMA30: PVA-PMMA16 nanoparticles in the brain following i.v. and i.n. administration to Hsd:ICR mice (n = 3). (a) Scheme of the top and bottom brain and (b) average radiance over time obtained after the subtraction of the control (untreated mice brain) radiance (n = 3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blanco-Prieto M. Drug Delivery to the Central Nervous System: A Review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003;6:252–273. - PubMed
    1. Pardridge W. Non-Invasive Drug Delivery to the Human Brain Using Endogenous Blood-Brain Barrier Transport Systems. Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today. 1999;2:49–59. doi: 10.1016/S1461-5347(98)00117-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oller-Salvia B., Sanchez-Navarro M., Giralt E., Teixido M. Blood-Brain Barrier Shuttle Peptides: An Emerging Paradigm for Brain Delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:4690–4707. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00076B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Löscher W., Potschka H. Blood-Brain Barrier Active Efflux Transporters: ATP-Binding Cassette Gene Family. NeuroRx. 2005;2:86–98. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.86. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dallas S., Miller D.S., Bendayan R. Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins: Expression and Function in the Central Nervous System. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006;58:140–161. doi: 10.1124/pr.58.2.3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources