Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):218.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00883-9.

Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia occurred after radical prostatectomy-comparisons of different approaches

Affiliations

Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia occurred after radical prostatectomy-comparisons of different approaches

Lijia Liu et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: To observe cumulative morbidity of postoperative inguinal hernia (PIH) and identify risk factors associated with its development in patients who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP) or robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) operation.

Methods: From June 2009 to September 2016, 756 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had undergone RRP, LRP or RALP in our center were included in this study. Patients with PIH were retrospectively investigated in such factors as age, BMI, previous abdominal operations, diabetes mellitus history, hypertension history, prostate volume, previous hernia, operative methods, operative approach, preoperative Gleason, clinical T-stage, PLND situation, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Univariate and multivariate cox hazard regressions analysis were utilized to identify risk factors predisposing to PIH.

Results: A total of 53 of 751(7.1%) patients developed PIH at a median follow-up period of 43 months. PIH rate in RRP was significantly higher compared to LRP and RALP group (RRP: 15.3%, LRP: 6.7%, RALP:1.9%, P = 0.038). Right side (69.8%) and indirect (88.8%) PIH were dominant type in hernia group. Univariate and multivariate cox hazard regressions analysis indicated that age and RRP approach were identified to be implicated to PIH [adjusted hazard ratio7.39(1.18-46.39), 2.93(95% CI 1.47-5.84)].

Conclusions: RRP technique and older age, especially patients over 80 years, are associated with higher incidence for PIH development. Appropriate prophylaxis during the operation should be evaluated for those in high-risk.

Keywords: Older age; Postoperative inguinal hernia; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict / competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Kaplan–Meier PIH-disease-free progression stratified by operative methods
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Kaplan–Meier PIH-disease-free progression stratified by age
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The Kaplan–Meier PIH-disease-free progression stratified by clinical T-stage

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University hospital, Sweden. Urology. 2010;75:1092–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chung CS, Jeong GY, Kim SH, Lee DK. Inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;85:175–179. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW., Jr Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1996;47:536–537. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80491-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakai Y, Okuno T, Kijima T, Iwai A, Matsuoka Y, Kawakami S, et al. Simple proPIHylactic procedure of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: isolation of the spermatic cord. Int J Urol. 2009;16:848–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02370.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources