Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 2;17(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00375-x.

Controlled human exposures to wood smoke: a synthesis of the evidence

Affiliations
Review

Controlled human exposures to wood smoke: a synthesis of the evidence

Carley Schwartz et al. Part Fibre Toxicol. .

Abstract

Background: Exposure to particulate matter (PM) from wood combustion represents a global health risk, encompassing diverse exposure sources; indoor exposures due to cooking in developing countries, ambient PM exposures from residential wood combustion in developed countries, and the predicted increasing number of wildfires due to global warming. Although physicochemical properties of the PM, as well as the exposure levels vary considerably between these sources, controlled human exposure studies may provide valuable insight to the harmful effects of wood smoke (WS) exposures in general. However, no previous review has focused specifically on controlled human exposure studies to WS.

Results: The 22 publications identified, resulting from 12 controlled human studies, applied a range of combustion conditions, exposure levels and durations, and exercise components in their WS exposure. A range of airway, cardiovascular and systemic endpoints were assessed, including lung function and heart rate measures, inflammation and oxidative stress. However, the possibility for drawing general conclusions was precluded by the large variation in study design, resulting in differences in physicochemical properties of WS, effective dose, as well as included endpoints and time-points for analysis. Overall, there was most consistency in reported effects for airways, while oxidative stress, systemic inflammation and cardiovascular physiology did not show any clear patterns.

Conclusion: Based on the reviewed controlled human exposure studies, conclusions regarding effects of acute WS exposure on human health are premature. Thus, more carefully conducted human studies are needed. Future studies should pay particular attention to the applied WS exposure, to assure that both exposure levels and PM properties reflect the research question.

Keywords: Airway; Controlled human exposure; Inflammation; Review; Systemic; Wood smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
WS characteristics and sources
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Review process algorithm

References

    1. WHO . Household air pollution and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. Barry C. Increase in wood as main source of household heating most notable in the northeast. Washington (DC): U.S. Energy Information Administration; 2014.
    1. Sigsgaard T, Forsberg B, Annesi-Maesano I, Blomberg A, Bølling A, Boman C, Bønlokke J, Brauer M, Bruce N, Heroux ME, et al. Health impacts of anthropogenic biomass burning in the developed world. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(6):1577–1588. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01865-2014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Annual Emissions Trend . Environmental Protection Agency. 2020.
    1. Sun Q, Miao C, Hanel M, Borthwick AGL, Duan Q, Ji D, Li H. Global heat stress on health, wildfires, and agricultural crops under different levels of climate warming. Environ Int. 2019;128:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.025. - DOI - PubMed