Clinical and Financial Implications of Positive Margins After Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Resection: A Longitudinal Evaluation
- PMID: 33009148
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002566
Clinical and Financial Implications of Positive Margins After Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Resection: A Longitudinal Evaluation
Abstract
Background: Management of positive margins after nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) excision is debated in the literature. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of residual tumor in reexcised NMSC specimens after previous excision with positive margins, to determine the rate of recurrence in patients who had positive margins but did not undergo reexcision, and to define the financial burden of negative reexcisions.
Methods: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was conducted on all patients with NMSC excision over a 15-year period. Patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent initial NMSC excision with negative frozen section margins, but had positive permanent section margins were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent reexcision for clearance of tumor (n = 161) or those who did not undergo further reexcision (n = 105). Variables collected include demographics, previous skin cancer, tumor location, cancer subtype, excision measurements, and time between first and second excisions. For those patients who did not undergo reexcision, charts were examined for recurrence.
Results: Two hundred sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria with mean follow-up of 60 months. Eighty-three (52%) of 161 patients with positive margins on initial excision had no evidence of residual cancer upon reexcision. Residual tumor on permanent section was confirmed in 48% of patients. Patients with a previous history of basal cell carcinoma were more likely to have a true-positive margin after reexcision (P = 0.02). Larger reexcisions were more likely to harbor residual cancer (5.9 cm2, P = 0.04). Patients with positive margins that did not undergo reexcision, only 7 of 105 patients (6.6%) had recurrence. No mortalities were reported from NMSC recurrence. US $247,672 was spent in reexcision for negative margins in 98 patients for an average cost of US $2984 per case.
Conclusions: Forty-eight percent of NMSC patients with positive margins had residual tumor upon reexcision. There were 6.6% of the patients who did not undergo resection after positive margins developed recurrence of disease at 5 years. Patients requiring larger reexcisions or those with a prior history of BCC were more likely to have residual cancer upon reexcision. This study suggests that observation is an appropriate option of care for certain patients with residual NMSC on permanent pathology.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.
Similar articles
-
Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.Am J Surg. 2000 Feb;179(2):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00272-5. Am J Surg. 2000. PMID: 10773138
-
Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):729-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26467458
-
The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):331-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00271.x. Breast J. 2006. PMID: 16848842
-
Definition and Management of Positive Margins for Invasive Breast Cancer.Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;98(4):761-771. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 24. Surg Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 30005772 Review.
-
Reexcision for positive margins in breast cancer: A predictive score of residual disease.Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;24(3):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 13. Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26298198 Review.
References
-
- Farhi D, Dupin N, Palagié A, et al. Incomplete excision of basal cell carcinoma: rate and associated factors among 362 consecutive cases. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:1207–1214.
-
- Wong CS, Strange RC, Lear JT. Basal cell carcinoma. BMJ. 2003;327:794–798.
-
- Skin Cancer Facts. [American Cancer Society web site]. March 25, 2013. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/skin-cancer.html. Accessed January 30, 2014.
-
- Koplin L, Zarem HA. Recurrent basal cell carcinoma: a review concerning the incidence, behavior, and management of recurrent basal cell carcinoma, with emphasis on the incompletely excised lesion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65:656–664.
-
- Bisson MA, Dunkin CS, Suvarna SK, et al. Do plastic surgeons resect basal cell carcinomas too widely? A prospective study comparing surgical and histologic margins. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:293–297.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous