Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 33009192
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001360
Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: The challenge of managing acute postoperative pain is the well tolerated and effective administration of analgesics with a minimum of side effects. The standard therapeutic approach is patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with systemic opioids. To overcome problems of oscillating opioid concentrations, we studied patient-controlled analgesia by target-controlled infusion (TCI-PCA) as an alternative.
Objective: To compare efficacy, safety and side effects of standard PCA with TCI-PCA for postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone.
Design: Single-blinded, randomised trial.
Setting: University Hospital, Germany from December 2013 to April 2015.
Participants: Fifty adults undergoing cardiac surgery.
Interventions: Postoperative pain therapy on the ICU was managed with intravenous (i.v.) hydromorphone and patients randomised to TCI-PCA with target plasma concentrations between 0.8 and 10 ng ml, or PCA with bolus doses of 0.2 mg. Pain was regularly assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and cardiac output were continuously monitored, and adverse events were registered throughout the study.
Main outcome measures: NRS pain ratings, hydromorphone doses, haemodynamic effects and side effects.
Results: NRS pain ratings, total doses of hydromorphone and haemodynamic data did not differ significantly between TCI-PCA and PCA. The number of bolus doses during PCA was significantly higher than the number of target increases during TCI-PCA (P = 0.006). The number of negative requests was also significantly higher during PCA than during TCI-PCA (P = 0.02). The respiratory rate on the first postoperative morning was 25 ± 6 min during TCI-PCA, compared with 19 ± 4 min during PCA (P = 0.022). Nausea occurred in 30% after TCI-PCA and 24% after PCA (P = 0.46).
Conclusion: TCI-PCA was effective and well tolerated in acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate this approach in clinical practice.
Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2013-002875-16, and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02035709.
References
-
- Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, et al. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD003348.
-
- Jeleazcov C, Ihmsen H, Saari TI, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion of hydromorphone in postoperative pain therapy. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:56–68.
-
- Struys MM, Sahinovic M, Lichtenbelt BJ, et al. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:38–47.
-
- Jeleazcov C, Saari TI, Ihmsen H, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative pain therapy. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:378–391.
-
- Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10:244–251.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous