Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan 4;46(1):E14-E33.
doi: 10.1503/jpn.190179.

Noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samuel J Westwood  1 , Joaquim Radua  1 , Katya Rubia  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samuel J Westwood et al. J Psychiatry Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could provide treatment alternatives to stimulant medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), given some evidence for improvements in cognition and clinical symptoms. However, despite a lack of solid evidence for their use, rTMS and tDCS are already offered clinically and commercially in ADHD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically appraise rTMS and tDCS studies in ADHD to inform good research and clinical practice.

Methods: A systematic search (up to February 2019) identified 18 studies (rTMS 4, tDCS 14; 311 children and adults with ADHD) stimulating mainly the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). We included 12 anodal tDCS studies (232 children and adults with ADHD) in 3 random-effects meta-analyses of cognitive measures of attention, inhibition and processing speed.

Results: The review of rTMS and tDCS showed positive effects in some functions but not others, and little evidence for clinical improvement. The meta-analyses of 1 to 5 sessions of anodal tDCS over mainly the left or bilateral dlPFC showed trend-level improvements in inhibition and processing speed, but not in attention.

Limitations: Heterogeneity in stimulation parameters, patient age and outcome measures limited the interpretation of findings.

Conclusion: The review and meta-analysis showed limited evidence that 1 to 5 sessions of rTMS and tDCS, mostly of the dlPFC, improved clinical or cognitive measures of ADHD. These findings did not support using rTMS or tDCS of the dlPFC as an alternative neurotherapy for ADHD as yet. Larger, multi-session stimulation studies identifying more optimal sites and stimulation parameters in combination with cognitive training could achieve larger effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of study selection.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias ratings for (A) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), (B) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and (C) individual studies. Note: risk of bias ratings were the same for both studies reported in Nejati et al.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of measures of (A) attention, (B) inhibition and (C) processing speed. CI = confidence interval; tDCS = transcranial direct current stimulation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association; Washington (DC): 2000.
    1. Cazzoli D, Jung S, Nyffeler T, et al. The role of the right frontal eye field in overt visual attention deployment as assessed by free visual exploration. Neuropsychologia. 2015;74:37–41. - PubMed
    1. Noreika V, Falter CM, Rubia K. Timing deficits in attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): evidence from neurocognitive and neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51:235–66. - PubMed
    1. Coghill D, Toplak M, Rhodes S, et al. Cognitive functioning in ADHD: inhibition, memory, temporal discounting, decision-making, timing and reaction time variability. In: Banaschewski T, Coghill D, Zuddas A, editors. Oxford textbook of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. chapter 10 Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2018.
    1. Norman LJ, Carlisi C, Lukito S, et al. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comparative meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:815–25. - PubMed

Publication types