Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;185(2):479-494.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05947-1. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions

Affiliations

Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions

Dogan S Polat et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the performance of an imaging and biopsy parameters-based multivariate model in decreasing unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.

Methods: In an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed all high-risk lesions (HRL) identified at imaging-guided biopsy in our institution between July 1, 2014-July 1, 2017. Lesions were categorized high-risk-I (HR-I = atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical papillary lesion) and II (HR-II = Flat epithelial atypia, radial scar, benign papilloma). Patient risk factors, lesion features, detection and biopsy modality, excision and cancer upgrade rates were collected. Reference standard for upgrade was either excision or at least 2-year imaging follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a multivariate model using HRL type, lesion and biopsy needle size for surgical cancer upgrade with performance assessed using ROC analysis.

Results: Of 699 HRL in 652 patients, 525(75%) had reference standard available, and 48/525(9.1%) showed cancer at surgical excision. Excision (84.5% vs 51.1%) and upgrade (17.6%vs1.8%) rates were higher in HR-I compared to HR-II (p < 0.01). In HR-I, small needle size < 12G vs ≥ 12G [32.1% vs 13.2%, p < 0.01] and less cores [< 6 vs ≥ 6, 28.6%vs13.7%, p = 0.01] were significantly associated with higher cancer upgrades. Our multivariate model had an AUC = 0.87, saving 28.1% of benign surgeries with 100% sensitivity, based on HRL subtype, lesion size(mm, continuous), needle size (< 12G vs ≥ 12G) and biopsy modality (US vs MRI vs stereotactic) CONCLUSION: Our multivariate model using lesion size, needle size and patient age had a high diagnostic performance in decreasing unnecessary surgeries and shows promise as a decision support tool.

Keywords: Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Atypical lobular hyperplasia; Atypical papilloma; Breast cancer; Lobular carcinoma in situ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Norton L (2015) Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(4):227–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study Cancer 55(11):2698–2708 - PubMed
    1. Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Hill AD, O'Doherty A, O'Higgins N, Quinn CM (2007) Predictive value of breast lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" and "suspicious for malignancy" determined by needle core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2):704–711. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9212-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mooney KL, Bassett LW, Apple SK (2016) Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review. Mod Pathol 29(12):1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.127 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taffurelli M, Pellegrini A, Ghignone F, Santini D, Zanotti S, Serra M (2016) Positive predictive value of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3): Can we identify high risk patients? The value of a multidisciplinary team and implications in the surgical treatment. Surg Oncol 25(2):119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2016.04.002 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources