Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;30(2):470-477.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1333. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

Perceived barriers to paternal expanded carrier screening following a positive maternal result: To screen or not to screen

Affiliations

Perceived barriers to paternal expanded carrier screening following a positive maternal result: To screen or not to screen

Katherine Carlotti et al. J Genet Couns. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening identifies individuals who are at risk of having a child with an autosomal recessive condition. The most accurate risk assessment requires that both mother and father undergo carrier screening to determine whether they are carriers of the same autosomal recessive condition. A couple identified as carriers of the same condition has a 25% chance of having a child with that condition. However, the father does not always opt for carrier screening following a positive result in the mother. This study aimed to identify barriers that prevent the father from carrier screening after a positive finding in the mother. A total of 58 women participated in this study. All participants had undergone expanded carrier screening prior to the study and had met with a genetic counselor for a pre-test, informed consent session. Of the 58 women, 34 had partners who did not undergo screening and 24 had partners who did. Participants completed a survey to determine the barriers that prevented the father of the baby's participation. We report that the mother's insurance type, whether the father has insurance, relationship status, and knowledge of the carrier screen showed statistically significant differences between women whose partners underwent screening and those that did not. In summary, our finding suggests that increasing insurance coverage of paternal screening and improving the patient's knowledge of the expanded screen would encourage paternal screening.

Keywords: autosomal recessive; barriers; carrier screening; genetic counseling; paternal screening; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aetna. (2019). Noninvasive Down Syndrome Screening. Available from www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/200_299/0282.html
    1. Beauchamp, K. A., Johansen Taber, K. A., & Muzzey, D. (2019). Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a 176-condition expanded carrier screen. Genetics in Medicine, 21, 1948-1957. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0455-8.
    1. BlueCross BlueShield Corporate Medical Policy. (2019) “Prenatal Screening AHS - G2035”, www.bluecrossnc.com/sites/default/files/document/attachment/services/pub...
    1. Clarke, E. V., Schneider, J. L., Lynch, F., Kauffman, T. L., Leo, M. C., Rosales, A. G., & Goddard, K. A. B. (2018). Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening. PLoS One, 13(7), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200139.
    1. Edwards, J. G., Feldman, G., Goldberg, J., Gregg, A. R., Norton, M. E., Rose, N. C., & Watson, M. S. (2015). Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(3), 653-662. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000666.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources