Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jan;106(1):65-70.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316888. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

Two-year outcomes of the MINIject drainage system for uncontrolled glaucoma from the STAR-I first-in-human trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Two-year outcomes of the MINIject drainage system for uncontrolled glaucoma from the STAR-I first-in-human trial

Philippe Denis et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: The current study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the stand-alone implantation of the MINIject (iSTAR Medical, Wavre, Belgium) supraciliary, microinvasive glaucoma drainage device in patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: This prospective, multicentre, first-in-human, single-arm interventional study evaluated stand-alone, ab interno implantation in 25 patients of a 5 mm long uveoscleral device made of STAR biocompatible material, which is a soft, microporous, flexible silicone. The primary outcome was the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) at 6 months compared with baseline, and follow-up continued until 2 years for 21 patients. Secondary outcomes included success defined as diurnal IOP of ≤21 mmHg and >5 mmHg with an IOP reduction of 20% without (complete) or with/without (qualified) glaucoma medication.

Results: Mean baseline IOP was 23.2±2.9 mmHg on 2.0±1.1 glaucoma medication ingredients and decreased to 13.8±3.5 mmHg (-40.7% reduction) on 1.0±1.3 medications 2 years after implantation. Complete success was achieved in 47.6% of patients (10/21) and qualified success in 100% of patients (21/21) at the 2-year follow-up. All patients achieved a 20% IOP reduction with 48% of patients medication-free. No serious ocular adverse events or additional glaucoma surgery were reported. Mean central endothelial cell density (ECD) mildly decreased from 2411 cells/mm2 (n=26) to 2341 cells/mm2 (n=21) at 24 months, which represents a 5% decrease for matched eyes. No patient had a ≥30% decrease in central ECD.

Conclusion: This first-in-human study on the stand-alone implantation of the MINIject supraciliary drainage system shows promising IOP-lowering results and medication reduction over 24 months with few adverse events.

Trial registration number: NCT03193736.

Keywords: Anterior chamber; Aqueous humour; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Treatment surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PD: iSTAR Medical, Alcon, Allergan, Glaukos, Santen, Thea; CH: iSTAR Medical, Thea Pharma; GMD: Alcon, Allergan, Bausch & Lomb, Glaukos, Labtician, Novartis, MST, Santen, Sight Sciences; KPR, AK, EC: no financial interests; ZH: Vice President of Regulatory and Clinical at iSTAR Medical; IKA: Aequus, Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Alcon, Allergan, ArcScan, Bausch & Lomb, Beaver Visitec, Camras Vision, Carl Zeiss Meditec, CorNeat Vision, Ellex, ElutiMed, Equinox, Genentech, Glaukos, Gore, Iantech, InjectSense, Iridex, iSTAR Medical, Ivantis, Johnson & Johnson Vision, KeLoTec, LayerBio, Leica Microsystems, MicroOptx, New World Medical, Omega Ophthalmics, PolyActiva, Sanoculis, Santen, Science Based Health, Sight Sciences, Stroma, TrueVision, Vizzari.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MINIject implant (iSTAR Medical, Wavre, Belgium) made of STAR material. Reprinted from Denis et al, copyright (2019), with permission from Elsevier and the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean intraocular pressure (mmHg) with 95% CI error bars from baseline to 24-month follow-up in the intention-to-treat population.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example ultrasound biomicroscopy images at week 1 (left) and 24-month (right) follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081–90. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23:96–104. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker B, Neufeld A. Pressure dependence of uveoscleral outflow. J Glaucoma 2002;11:545. 10.1097/00061198-200210000-00017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bill A. Some aspects of aqueous humour drainage. Eye 1993;7:14–19. 10.1038/eye.1993.4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alm A, Nilsson SF. Uveoscleral outflow: a review. Exp Eye Res 2009;88:760–8. 10.1016/j.exer.2008.12.012 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data