Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers
- PMID: 33011736
- PMCID: PMC7532738
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00738-0
Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers
Abstract
Many research sponsors and genetic researchers agree that some medically relevant genetic findings should be offered to participants. The scarcity of research specific to returning genetic results related to psychiatric disorders hinders the ability to develop ethically justified and empirically informed guidelines for responsible return of results for these conditions. We surveyed 407 psychiatric genetics researchers from 39 countries to examine their perceptions of challenges to returning individual results and views about best practices for the process of offering and returning results. Most researchers believed that disclosure of results should be delayed if a patient-participant is experiencing significant psychiatric symptoms. Respondents felt that there is little research on the impact of returning results to participants with psychiatric disorders and agreed that return of psychiatric genetics results to patient-participants may lead to discrimination by insurance companies or other third parties. Almost half of researchers believed results should be returned through a participant's treating psychiatrist, but many felt that clinicians lack knowledge about how to manage genetic research results. Most researchers thought results should be disclosed by genetic counselors or medical geneticists and in person; however, almost half also supported disclosure via telemedicine. This is the first global survey to examine the perspectives of researchers with experience working with this patient population and with these conditions. Their perspectives can help inform the development of much-needed guidelines to promote responsible return of results related to psychiatric conditions to patients with psychiatric disorders.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Return of results in a global survey of psychiatric genetics researchers: practices, attitudes, and knowledge.Genet Med. 2021 Feb;23(2):298-305. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00986-x. Epub 2020 Oct 9. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 33033403 Free PMC article.
-
Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):345-352. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0642-7. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Genet Med. 2020. PMID: 31477844 Free PMC article.
-
Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 Dec;180(8):589-600. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32682. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019. PMID: 30358063 Free PMC article.
-
International Society of Psychiatric Genetics Ethics Committee: Issues facing us.Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 Dec;180(8):543-554. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32736. Epub 2019 May 23. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019. PMID: 31124312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical issues in psychiatric genetics research: points to consider.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Dec;171(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1502-2. Epub 2003 Sep 10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003. PMID: 13680086 Review.
Cited by
-
My Research Results: a program to facilitate return of clinically actionable genomic research findings.Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar;30(3):363-366. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00973-z. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 34602610 Free PMC article.
-
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34748551 Free PMC article.
-
A practical checklist for return of results from genomic research in the European context.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Jun;31(6):687-695. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01328-6. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 36949262 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Returning individual research results to participants: guidance for a new research paradigm. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018. - PubMed
-
- Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, Puggal M, Beskow LM, Biesecker L, et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:574–80. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Weiner C. Anticipate and communicate: ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues) Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180:562–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical