Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 2:11:875.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00875. eCollection 2020.

Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke-A Delphi Study

Affiliations

Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke-A Delphi Study

Johannes Pohl et al. Front Neurol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Outcome measures are key to tailor rehabilitation goals to the stroke patient's individual needs and to monitor poststroke recovery. The large number of available outcome measures leads to high variability in clinical use. Currently, an internationally agreed core set of motor outcome measures for clinical application is lacking. Therefore, the goal was to develop such a set to serve as a quality standard in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke. Methods: Outcome measures for the upper and lower extremities, and activities of daily living (ADL)/stroke-specific outcomes were identified and presented to stroke rehabilitation experts in an electronic Delphi study. In round 1, clinical feasibility and relevance of the outcome measures were rated on a 7-point Likert scale. In round 2, those rated at least as "relevant" and "feasible" were ranked within the body functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Furthermore, measurement time points poststroke were indicated. In round 3, answers were reviewed in reference to overall results to reach final consensus. Results: In total, 119 outcome measures were presented to 33 experts from 18 countries. The recommended core set includes the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment and Action Research Arm Test for the upper extremity section; the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, 10-m Walk Test, Timed-Up-and-Go, and Berg Balance Scale for the lower extremity section; and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index or Functional Independence Measure for the ADL/stroke-specific section. The Stroke Impact Scale was recommended spanning all ICF domains. Recommended measurement time points are days 2 ± 1 and 7; weeks 2, 4, and 12; 6 months poststroke and every following 6th month. Discussion and Conclusion: Agreement was found upon a set of nine outcome measures for application in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke, with seven measurement time points following the stages of poststroke recovery. This core set was specifically developed for clinical practice and distinguishes itself from initiatives for stroke rehabilitation research. The next challenge is to implement this clinical core set across the full stroke care continuum with the aim to improve the transparency, comparability, and quality of stroke rehabilitation at a regional, national, and international level.

Keywords: Delphi study; clinical; motor rehabilitation; outcome measures; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the Delphi process. ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; OMs, outcome measures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of outcome measures per Delphi round, section, and ICF domain. ADL, activities of daily living; ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; OMs, outcome measures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:459–80. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Béjot Y, Bailly H, Durier J, Giroud M. Epidemiology of stroke in Europe and trends for the 21st century. La Presse Médicale. (2016) 45:e391–8. 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.10.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, Dichgans M, Cordonnier C, Guekht A, et al. . Action plan for stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J. (2018) 3:309–36. 10.1177/2396987318808719 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franceschini M, Porta FL, Agosti M, Massucci M. Is health-related-quality of life of stroke patients influenced by neurological impairments at 1 year after stroke? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2010) 46:11. - PubMed
    1. Grube MM, Dohle C, Djouchadar D, Rech P, Bienek K, Dietz-Fricke U, et al. . Evidence-based quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. (2012) 43:142–6. 10.1161/strokeAHA.111.627679 - DOI - PubMed