Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 15:2020:8849105.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8849105. eCollection 2020.

Ethical Aspects concerning Instrument Separation and Perforations during Endodontic Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Ethical Aspects concerning Instrument Separation and Perforations during Endodontic Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study

Raidan Ba-Hattab et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

Aim: During endodontic treatment, dentists may face various unwanted procedural accidents, at any stage of the treatment that might compromise endodontic treatment outcome and bring obstacles to dentists as well. This study aimed to address and analyze several ethical concerns relating to the behavioural conduct of dentists towards endodontic instrument separation as well as perforation of the crown and/or root during root canal treatment in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Method: Hundred and eleven questionnaires were distributed among dentists working in Riyadh in university clinics and government and private sectors. Data were collected, reviewed, and statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact and chi-square tests at a 5% significance level, using SPSS software.

Results: 54.5% of the respondents have encountered instrument separation. 53.2% stated that they would inform the patient about the instrument separation. 43.6% of the respondents had experienced perforation during root canal treatment, and 54.9% reported that they would inform the patient of the accident.

Conclusion: Within the limitation of this survey, we concluded that most of the dental professionals did not hesitate to adhere to the correct ethical conduct, and they would inform the patient if an incident occurred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Manca R., Bruti V., Napoletano S., Marinelli E. A 15 years survey for dental malpractice claims in Rome, Italy. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2018;58:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. René N., Owall B. Dental malpractice in Sweden. Journal of Law and Ethics in Dentistry. 1991;4:16–31. - PubMed
    1. Hapcook C. P. Dental malpractice claims. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137(10):1444–1445. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. da Silva R. F., da Rocha Pereira S. D., Júnior E. D., et al. Ethical aspects concerning endodontic instrument fracture. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2008;7(25):1535–1538.
    1. Pinchi V., Pradella F., Gasparetto L., Norelli G.-A. Trends in endodontic claims in Italy. International Dental Journal. 2013;63(1):43–48. doi: 10.1002/idj.12004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources