Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 2:10:1342.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01342. eCollection 2020.

A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis

Affiliations

A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis

Lei Ji et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer with liver metastasis consists of a group of heterogeneous diseases, and survival time may be significantly different, ranging from a few months to several years. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM). Methods: In total, 1022 eligible patients from January 2007 to December 2018 were selected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and were temporally in the training (n = 715) and validation (n = 307) set. According to regression coefficients found in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the final results were transformed into the prognostic scores. On the basis of these scores, patients were finally classified into three risk groups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. Then, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were used to assess discrimination and calibration of this prognostic model in the validation set. Results: Molecular subtypes, metastatic-free interval (MFI), extrahepatic metastasis, and liver function tests were identified as independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. According to risk stratification, intermediate-risk (hazard ratio (HR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-2.58, P < 0.001) and high-risk groups (HR 6.94, 95% CI 5.25-9.16, P < 0.001) had significantly worse prognoses in comparison with the low-risk group regarding overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. The median OS in these three groups were 39.97, 21.03, and 8.80 months, respectively. These results were confirmed in the internal and external validation cohorts. Conclusions: Based on molecular classification of tumors, routine laboratory tests, and other clinical information easily accessible in daily clinical practice, we developed a clinical tool for BCLM patients to predict their prognosis. Moreover, it may be useful for identifying the subgroup with unfavorable prognosis and individualization of treatment.

Keywords: breast cancer; liver metastasis; prognostic factors; prognostic model; prognostic score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time-dependent ROC curves of the prognostic model in the training set (A) and the validation set (B). Overall survival from metastasis of the three prognostic groups in the training (C) and validation set (D).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The calibration curve for predicting patient survival at 1 year (A) and 3 years (B) in the training set and at 1 year (C) in the validation set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. . Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. (2010) 28:3271–7. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim B, Hortobagyi GN. Current challenges of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2016) 35:495–514. 10.1007/s10555-016-9636-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J, Barriere J, Namer M, Mari V, et al. . Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. (2008) 19:2012–9. 10.1093/annonc/mdn424 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puente J, Lopez-Tarruella S, Ruiz A, Lluch A, Pastor M, Alba E, et al. . Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2,322 patients from the GEICAM Spanish El Alamo Register. Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2010) 122:591–600. 10.1007/s10549-009-0687-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regierer AC, Wolters R, Ufen MP, Weigel A, Novopashenny I, Kohne CH, et al. . An internally and externally validated prognostic score for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 2269 patients. Ann Oncol. (2014) 25:633–8. 10.1093/annonc/mdt539 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources