Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 4:10:1481.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01481. eCollection 2020.

An Observational Study of Acquired EGFR T790M-Dependent Resistance to EGFR-TKI Treatment in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Taiwan

Affiliations

An Observational Study of Acquired EGFR T790M-Dependent Resistance to EGFR-TKI Treatment in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Taiwan

Shang-Gin Wu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

In Taiwan, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib are served as first-line therapy for non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations. However, the majority of patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs, progress through acquiring EGFR T790M mutations (T790M), which is the most common resistant mechanism. Patients with T790M gain the opportunity of subsequent treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prior EGFR-TKI therapy and incidence of acquired T790M resistance in lung adenocarcinoma patients who have progressed on first/second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. This retrospective study included lung adenocarcinoma patients who had a radiographically-confirmed progressive disease under EGFR-TKI treatment and had re-biopsy samples for T790M testing from seven medical centers in Taiwan from June 2013 to December 2018. Patients harboring de novo T790M or using more than one EGFR-TKI were excluded. Of the 407 patients enrolled, the overall T790M acquisition rate was 52.8%. The patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib had a statistically significant difference in the T790M rates (59.9, 45.5, and 52.7%, respectively; p = 0.037) after disease progression. Patients with common baseline EGFR mutations (Del-19 and L858R) (p = 0.005) and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs (p < 0.001) had higher chances of T790M acquisition. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further showed that patients with common baseline EGFR mutations, gefitinib (compared to erlotinib) administration, and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs had higher T790M incidence. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acquired T790M between different re-biopsy tissue samples or complications. In conclusion, this study showed that patients who progressed from gefitinib treatment, bearing common EGFR mutations, and with longer EGFR-TKI treatment duration had increased incidence of T790M acquisition and, therefore, were suitable for subsequent osimertinib treatment.

Keywords: afatinib; epidermal growth factor receptor mutation; erlotinib; gefitinib; non-small cell lung cancer; osimertinib; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of patient enrollment. *There were 12 patients who switched to another EGFR-TKI as a first-line treatment due to the side effects (see Supplementary Figure 1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The different EGFR mutation types among the three areas in Taiwan. (p = 0.384).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The comparison of acquired T790M incidence between the three different EGFR-TKIs (Gefitinib vs. Erlotinib vs. Afatinib: 59.9 vs. 45.5 vs. 52.7%; respectively, p = 0.037).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in the three EGFR-TKI-treated adenocarcinoma patient cohorts. There was a significant difference between gefitinib (n = 162), erlotinib (n = 154), and afatinib (n = 91) (gefitinib vs. erlotinib vs. afatinib: 16.2 months vs. 12.1 months vs. 14.4 months, respectively; p = 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The comparison of acquired T790M incidence between different times to treatment discontinuation (TTD) of EGFR-TKIs (p < 0.001 by Chi-square test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The comparison of acquired T790M incidence between the different baseline EGFR mutation types (Del-19 vs. L858R vs. Other: 58.2 vs. 50.3 vs. 22.7%; p = 0.004). Del-19, deletion in exon 19; ns, not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2016, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; (2019).
    1. Wang BY, Huang JY, Cheng CY, Lin CH, Ko J, Liaw YP. Lung cancer and prognosis in taiwan: a population-based cancer registry. J Thorac Oncol. (2013) 8:1128–35. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31829ceba4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, et al. . Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2005) 97:339–46. 10.1093/jnci/dji055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kris M, Johnson B, Kwiatkowski D, Iafrate A, Wistuba I, Aronson S, et al. Identification of driver mutations in tumor specimens from 1,000 patients with lung adenocarcinoma: the NCI's lung cancer mutation consortium (LCMC). J Clin Oncol. (2011) 29:CRA7506 10.1371/journal.pone.0040109 - DOI
    1. Yeh P, Chen H, Andrews J, Naser R, Pao W, Horn L. DNA-mutation inventory to refine and enhance cancer treatment (DIRECT): a catalog of clinically relevant cancer mutations to enable genome-directed anticancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. (2013) 19:1894–901. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1894 - DOI - PMC - PubMed