Experience of nurse practitioners performing colonoscopy after endoscopic training in more than 1,000 patients
- PMID: 33015346
- PMCID: PMC7508647
- DOI: 10.1055/a-1221-4546
Experience of nurse practitioners performing colonoscopy after endoscopic training in more than 1,000 patients
Abstract
Background and study aims The demand for screening colonoscopy has continued to rise over the past two decades. As a result, the current workforce of gastroenterologists is unable to meet the needs for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Therefore, solutions are needed to improve this disparity, with non-physician endoscopists being a potential option. However, current literature on the performance of non-physicians in endoscopy is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of colonoscopy performed by three gastrointestinal fellowship-trained nurse practitioners (NPs). Methods This was a retrospective study performed at a single tertiary academic medical center. Colonoscopies performed by three gastrointestinal-specialized NPs after having completed training of at least 140 supervised colonoscopies were reviewed for analysis. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening purposes. Outcomes included colonoscopy quality indicators as defined by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/American College of Gastroenterology Taskforce (ASGE/ACG) Taskforce. Results The study included 1,012 subjects (mean age 56.2 years, female 51.5 %, African American 73.9 %) who underwent screening colonoscopies by three NPs. Cecal intubation was successful in 997 subjects (98.5 %). Mean adenoma detection rate was 35.6 %. Mean withdrawal time was 18.9 minutes. There were no adverse events including colonic perforations or delayed post-polypectomy bleeding. Conclusions Three fellowship-trained NPs in colonoscopy in the United States satisfied the quality indicators proposed by the ASGE/ACG Task force, demonstrating that adequately trained NPs can perform colonoscopy safely and effectively. With the demand for colonoscopy exceeding the supply, non-physicians could be part of the solution to meet the demands for CRC screening.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests Ms. Nandwani was on the Salix Pharmaceuticals Speakers Bureau.
Comment in
-
Consensus statement from a group of colorectal surgeons for health equity and justice.Endosc Int Open. 2022 Mar 14;10(3):E227-E228. doi: 10.1055/a-1672-3985. eCollection 2022 Mar. Endosc Int Open. 2022. PMID: 35295240 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419. S Afr Med J. 2020. PMID: 33403963
-
Comparisons of screening colonoscopy performed by a nurse practitioner and gastroenterologists: a single-center randomized controlled trial.Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):210-6. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31821ab5e6. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21637086 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees?Endoscopy. 2011 Nov;43(11):935-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256633. Epub 2011 Oct 13. Endoscopy. 2011. PMID: 21997723
-
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31188154
-
Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 12;8:19. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-8. eCollection 2023. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37197256 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of nurse assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan 16;39(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04585-5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38227195 Review.
-
Persistent Poverty, Rural Location, and Racial Segregation Are Factors in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low-Income and Uninsured Populations.J Adv Pract Oncol. 2025 May 4:1-13. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.14. Online ahead of print. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40599196 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and appropriateness of colonoscopy referrals at King Khalid University Hospital, Saudi Arabia: An opportunity to expand the colonoscopy screening.Saudi Med J. 2023 Nov;44(11):1167-1173. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.11.20230378. Saudi Med J. 2023. PMID: 37926463 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian considerations on updating the age of initiation for colorectal cancer screening in individuals at average risk.Can J Surg. 2025 Aug 8;68(4):E313-E324. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000825. Print 2025 Jul-Aug. Can J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40780872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of Risk Prevention Management Based on Heinrich's Law in Nursing Care of Elderly Patients Undergoing Digestive Endoscopy.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2502-2507. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10744. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39634913 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Cancer Society . Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2018. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018.
-
- Kahi C J, Pohl H, Myers L J et al.Colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in the veterans affairs health care system: a case–control Study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:481–488. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous