Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33016239
- DOI: 10.1177/0267659120960310
Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the evidence comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG.
Methods: Studies were systematically searched and identified using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) by two researchers independently. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, completeness of revascularization, blood transfusion rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays.
Results: The 21 studies including 4,889 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Compared with on-pump, the off-pump technique was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.72, p = 0.001). Moreover, a notably decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76, p = 0.0004) and incidence of post-operative new-onset atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, low cardiac output state, blood transfusion rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.35-0.60, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.78, p = 0.0007; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.37-0.70, p < 0.0001; OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.20-0.47, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.14-0.61, p = 0.001) and significantly shortened duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays (mean difference [MD] = -8.21 h, 95% CI = -11.74 to -4.68, p < 0.00001; MD = -0.77 d, 95% CI = -0.81 to -0.73, p < 0.00001; MD = -2.24 d, 95% CI = -3.17 to -1.32, p < 0.00001) could be observed when comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG. There was nonsignificant difference between off-pump and on-pump redo CABG in completeness of revascularization.
Conclusion: In patients undergoing redo CABG surgery, the off-pump technique was associated with decreased mortality, less post-operative complications when compared to on-pump.
Keywords: meta-analysis; off-pump; on-pump; redo coronary artery bypass grafting.
Similar articles
-
The off-pump technique in redo coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and major morbidities: propensity score analysis of data from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database†.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb;47(2):299-307; discussion 307-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu081. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 24623172
-
Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 11;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01115-0. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32393284 Free PMC article.
-
Reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery: the role of on-pump and off-pump techniques on factors affecting hospital mortality and morbidity.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19(6):435-40. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02043. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23411849
-
Mortality and Readmissions After On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):821-825. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020. PMID: 31836478
-
Repeat Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Off-Pump versus On-Pump Techniques in a Large Cohort of Patients.Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Sep;30(9):1281-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Heart Lung Circ. 2021. PMID: 33810970 Review.
Cited by
-
A Meta-Analysis of Early, Mid-term and Long-Term Mortality of On-Pump vs. Off-Pump in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 25;9:869987. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.869987. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35548406 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of non-point-of-care haemostasis management protocol implementation in cardiac surgery: A systematic review.Transfus Med. 2021 Oct;31(5):328-338. doi: 10.1111/tme.12790. Epub 2021 Jun 6. Transfus Med. 2021. PMID: 34096120 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative atrial fibrillation: from mechanisms to treatment.Eur Heart J. 2023 Mar 21;44(12):1020-1039. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad019. Eur Heart J. 2023. PMID: 36721960 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Significance of Simple Inflammatory Markers in Off Pump Surgery-Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 9;23(12):400. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2312400. eCollection 2022 Dec. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39076673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Off-pump Versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic patients: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies with a Propensity-Score Analysis.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07603-y. Online ahead of print. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024. PMID: 38990420 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical