Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 23;26(72):17381-17385.
doi: 10.1002/chem.202004425. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

A Zwitterionic Phosphonium Stannate(II) via Hydrogen Splitting by a Sn/P Frustrated Lewis-Pair and Reductive Elimination

Affiliations

A Zwitterionic Phosphonium Stannate(II) via Hydrogen Splitting by a Sn/P Frustrated Lewis-Pair and Reductive Elimination

Philipp Holtkamp et al. Chemistry. .

Abstract

The reactivity of the frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) (F5 C2 )3 SnCH2 P(tBu)2 (1) was investigated with respect to the activation of elemental hydrogen. The reaction of 1 at elevated hydrogen pressure afforded the intramolecular phosphonium stannate(II) (F5 C2 )2 SnCH2 PH(tBu)2 (3). It was characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction. NMR experiments with the two isotopologues H2 and D2 showed it to be formed via an H2 adduct (F5 C2 )3 HSnCH2 PH(tBu)2 (2) and the subsequent formal reductive elimination of pentafluoroethane; this is supported by DFT calculations. Parahydrogen-induced polarization experiments revealed the formation of a second product of the reaction of 1 with H2 , [HP(tBu)2 Me][Sn(C2 F5 )3 ] (4), in 1 H NMR spectra, whereas 2 was not detected due to its transient nature.

Keywords: activation; fluoroalkyl groups; frustrated Lewis pair; hydrogen; tin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
1H NMR spectra at 11.7 T of a) a sample of 1 (•) in CD2Cl2 and b) a sample of 1 in CD2Cl2 exposed to 10 bar of H2 after different times of reaction.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Reaction of FLP 1 with H2 on an NMR scale. Conversions were determined using 1H NMR integrals.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 3 from FLP 1 and H2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Molecular structure of compound 3 in the solid state. Ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; hydrogen atoms, apart from the P‐H moiety, are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: P(1)‐C(5) 1.800(10), P(1)‐C(6) 1.830(8), P(1)‐C(10) 1.831(9), Sn(1)‐C(1) 2.238(13), Sn(1)‐C(3) 2.347(17), Sn(1)‐C(5) 2.275(5); P(1)‐C(5)‐Sn(1) 118.6(4), C(5)‐P(1)‐C(6) 118.5(12), C(5)‐P(1)‐P(10) 105.5(13), C(6)‐P(1)‐P(10) 118.1(4), C(1)‐Sn(1)‐C(3) 92.3(3), C(1)‐Sn(1)‐C(5) 93.9(7), C(3)‐Sn(1)‐C(5) 84.4(9).
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Theoretical equilibrium between the tautomers 3 and 5.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) 1H NMR spectrum measured after addition of parahydrogen (5 bar) into a solution of 1 in CD2Cl2 at 60 °C and 9.4 T. Antiphase quartet signals of the P‐H proton are shown with blue arrows and underlined with a red dashed line. (b) A reference 1H NMR thermal spectrum of the same sample measured after 24 hours. The signals other than those of the P−H group belong to HC2F5, 3, CHDCl2 and H2 (see Figure 1). The high‐intensity signals corresponding to thermally polarized protons are off‐scale and are cut in (b) for a better visibility of other signals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Computed reaction profile for the H2‐splitting reaction of 1. All data have been computed at the PBE0(D3BJ)/def2‐TZVPP level of theory. The substituents at tin and phosphorus have been omitted for the sake of clarity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    1. Stephan D. W., Science 2016, 354, aaf7229; - PubMed
    1. Stephan D. W., Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 306–316; - PubMed
    1. Stephan D. W., Erker G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441; - PubMed
    2. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6498–6541;
    1. Stephan D. W., Erker G., Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 2625–2641;