Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;13(1):e20004.
doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20004. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Implementing within-cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs

Affiliations

Implementing within-cross genomic prediction to reduce oat breeding costs

Greg Mellers et al. Plant Genome. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

A barrier to the adoption of genomic prediction in small breeding programs is the initial cost of genotyping material. Although decreasing, marker costs are usually higher than field trial costs. In this study we demonstrate the utility of stratifying a narrow-base biparental oat population genotyped with a modest number of markers to employ genomic prediction at early and later generations. We also show that early generation genotyping data can reduce the number of lines for later phenotyping based on selections of siblings to progress. Using sets of small families selected at an early generation could enable the use of genomic prediction for adaptation to multiple target environments at an early stage in the breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate that mixed marker data can be effectively integrated to combine cheap dominant marker data (including legacy data) with more expensive but higher density codominant marker data in order to make within generation and between lineage predictions based on genotypic information. Taken together, our results indicate that small programs can test and initiate genomic predictions using sets of stratified, narrow-base populations and incorporating low density legacy genotyping data. This can then be scaled to include higher density markers and a broadened population base.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The stratification of within‐population advance of material in the ‘Buffalo’ × ‘Tardis’ population, including derivation of phenotyping and genotyping data used in this study
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of changes in ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction accuracy from the F2 to F7 generation in ‘Buffalo’ × ‘Tardis’ recombinant inbred lines for height and ear emergence in the field (F) and polytunnel (PT) based on varying proportions of genotyped F2 individuals

References

    1. Abed, A. , Pérez‐Rodríguez, P. , Crossa, J. , & Belzile, F. (2018). When less can be better: How can we make genomic selection more cost‐effective and accurate in barley? Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 131, 1873–1890. 10.1007/s00122-018-3120-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akdemir, D. , & Isidro‐Sánchez, J. (2019). Design of training populations for selective phenotyping in genomic prediction. Scientific Reports, 9. 10.1038/s41598-018-38081-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akdemir, D. , Sanchez, J. I. , & Jannink, J.‐L. (2015). Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm. Genetics Selection, Evolution, 47. 10.1186/s12711-015-0116-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arruda, M. P. , Brown, P. J. , Lipka, A. E. , Krill, A. M. , Thurber, C. , & Kolb, F. L. (2015). Genomic selection for predicting fusarium head blight resistance in a wheat breeding program. The Plant Genome, 8. 10.3835/plantgenome2015.01.0003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asoro, F. G. , Newell, M. A. , Beavis, W. D. , Scott, M. P. , & Jannink, J.‐L. (2011). Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in elite North American oats. The Plant Genome, 4, 132–144. 10.3835/plantgenome2011.02.0007 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources