Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 33016872
- PMCID: PMC7815237
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20372
Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Objective: Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) is frequently seen after prostate surgery because of various operative and postoperative factors. In this study, we aimed to present our results of perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction, which is a new technique of the perineal approach in the treatment of patients with VUAS after prostate cancer surgery.
Material and methods: Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction in our clinic between July 2017 and March 2019 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, surgical history, postoperative continence status, and additional treatment requirements were recorded. Perineoscopic surgery is defined as the visualization of the surgical site with instruments used in laparoscopy and the surgeon performing the entire operative procedure through the screen.
Results: The mean number of preoperative endoscopic bladder neck resections of the patients was 7±5.1, with a history of suprapubic cystostomy in 7 (43.7%) and radiotherapy in 5 (31.2%) patients before surgery. The mean surgical time was 126.2±13.1 min. The mean follow-up period was 13.2±6.8 months, and the success rate was 81.25%. During follow-up, two (12.5%) patients received perineoscopic re-do reconstruction because of stricture recurrence, and one (6.2%) patient was included in a urethral dilatation program.
Conclusion: Improving visualization and ergonomics with the perineoscopic approach can increase the success rate of bladder neck reconstruction in comparison with the standard approach. In addition, the lack of need for expanded dissection (corporal separation, inferior pubectomy) reduces postoperative complication rates.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Surgical approach to vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy.Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Mar;40(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Actas Urol Esp. 2016. PMID: 26515118 English, Spanish.
-
Patency and Incontinence Rates After Robotic Bladder Neck Reconstruction for Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis and Recalcitrant Bladder Neck Contractures: The Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Experience.Urology. 2018 Aug;118:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16. Urology. 2018. PMID: 29777787
-
Management of intractable bladder neck strictures following radical prostatectomy using the Memokath®045 stent.J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):621-625. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01035-9. Epub 2019 Oct 15. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31617064 Free PMC article.
-
[Anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy and bladder neck stenosis after benign prostate hyperplasia treatment: reconstructive options].Urologe A. 2020 Apr;59(4):398-407. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01143-7. Urologe A. 2020. PMID: 32055934 Review. German.
-
Management of Urethral Stricture and Bladder Neck Contracture Following Primary and Salvage Treatment of Prostate Cancer.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Oct;18(10):76. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0729-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28776126 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of open perineal and robot-assisted reconstruction in vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.World J Urol. 2025 Jul 7;43(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05808-w. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40622400
-
Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture (BNC) After Radical Prostatectomy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges.Res Rep Urol. 2023 Nov 7;15:495-507. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S350777. eCollection 2023. Res Rep Urol. 2023. PMID: 37954870 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of proliferative hypertrophic scars on determining treatment options for preventing recurrence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cross-sectional study.Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Apr 26;139(3):241-250. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0349.R1.28012021. eCollection 2021. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021. PMID: 33909829 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources