Comparison of minimally invasive approaches and standard median parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been actively advertised by the orthopedic industry. The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of four minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches and the medial parapatellar (MPP) approach to improve the American Knee Society Score (KSS) in primary TKA.

Materials and methods: Studies were comprehensively searched on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Science Direct up to June 2018 with a major focus on the outcome of KSS. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Quality assessment was performed using the GRADE system. Both pair-wise and network meta-analyses are calculated to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of four MIS and TKA approaches.

Results: Eleven trials with 1025 knees undergoing TKA were included. Our analysis showed that both MPP and MIS approaches provided improvement in terms of short-term (four-eight weeks) total, objective and functional KSS. The network-meta analysis revealed that MIS approaches showed a trend towards superior KSS improvement over standard MPP approaches. However, statistical advantages were only observed in the mini-MPP group for functional KSS compared to the conventional MPP and quadriceps-sparing (QS) groups.

Conclusions: Evidence shows that MIS TKA approaches are effective alternatives to MPP approaches. However, orthopedic surgeons should be cautiously optimistic about minimally invasive TKA in terms of KSS improvement.

Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; bayesian model; network meta-analysis; total knee arthroplasty; total knee replacement.