Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;21(1):e2000179.
doi: 10.1002/mabi.202000179. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks

Affiliations
Review

Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks

Jaideep Adhikari et al. Macromol Biosci. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

In this review, few established cell printing techniques along with their parameters that affect the cell viability during bioprinting are considered. 3D bioprinting is developed on the principle of additive manufacturing using biomaterial inks and bioinks. Different bioprinting methods impose few challenges on cell printing such as shear stress, mechanical impact, heat, laser radiation, etc., which eventually lead to cell death. These factors also cause alteration of cells phenotype, recoverable or irrecoverable damages to the cells. Such challenges are not addressed in detail in the literature and scientific reports. Hence, this review presents a detailed discussion of several cellular bioprinting methods and their process-related impacts on cell viability, followed by probable mitigation techniques. Most of the printable bioinks encompass cells within hydrogel as scaffold material to avoid the direct exposure of the harsh printing environment on cells. However, the advantages of printing with scaffold-free cellular aggregates over cell-laden hydrogels have emerged very recently. Henceforth, optimal and favorable crosslinking mechanisms providing structural rigidity to the cell-laden printed constructs with ideal cell differentiation and proliferation, are discussed for improved understanding of cell printing methods for the future of organ printing and transplantation.

Keywords: 3D bioprinting; cell printing process parameters; cell viability; cell-friendly crosslinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. A. N. Leberfinger, S. Dinda, Y. Wu, S. V. Koduru, V. Ozbolat, D. J. Ravnic, I. T. Ozbolat, Acta Biomater. 2019, 95, 32.
    1. J. Groll, J. Burdick, D.-W. Cho, B. Derby, M. Gelinsky, S. Heilshorn, T. Jüngst, J. Malda, V. A. Mironov, K. J. B. Nakayama, Biofabrication 2018, 11, 013001.
    1. S. Derakhshanfar, R. Mbeleck, K. Xu, X. Zhang, W. Zhong, M. Xing, Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 144.
    1. X. Du, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 301, 012023.
    1. S. V. Murphy, A. Atala, Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 773.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources