Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;24(3):222-230.
doi: 10.5213/inj.2040052.026. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Affiliations

Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Aram Kim et al. Int Neurourol J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent health condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Traditional methods of treatment for SUI, such as pubovaginal sling and Burch colposuspension, have been replaced by the midurethral sling because of its high efficacy, low complication and morbidity rates, and short learning curve. Although multiple behavioral and operative treatments exist, midurethral slings are the gold standard for the treatment of SUI in women. However, several reports have raised concerns about complications caused by the synthetic mesh used in midurethral slings. Therefore, surgical treatment for SUI in women must be chosen with care, taking into account potential complications. Herein, we review the current safety issues pertaining to the use of meshes, the efficacy of traditional surgeries, old and new midurethral slings, and recent data comparing the efficacy and safety of different surgical options. This review is aimed at developing practical guidelines for choosing surgical options for women with SUI.

Keywords: Burch colposuspension; Mesh complication; Midurethral slings; Pubovaginal sling; Stress urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aponte MM, Shah SR, Hickling D, Brucker BM, Rosenblum N, Nitti VW. Urodynamics for clinically suspected obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery in women. J Urol. 2013;190:598–602. - PubMed
    1. James MB, Theofanides MC, Sui W, Onyeji I, Badalato GM, Chung DE. Sling procedures for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: comparison of national practice patterns between urologists and gynecologists. J Urol. 2017;198:1386–91. - PubMed
    1. Kosilov K, Kuzina I, Loparev S, Gainullina Y, Kosilova L, Prokofyeva A. Influence of the short-term intake of high doses of solifenacin and trospium on cognitive function and health-related quality of life in older women with urinary incontinence. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22:41–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bent AE, Foote J, Siegel S, Faerber G, Chao R, Gormley EA. Collagen implant for treating stress urinary incontinence in women with urethral hypermobility. J Urol. 2001;166:1354–7. - PubMed
    1. Daneshgari F. Words of wisdom. Re: FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1235–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources