Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application
- PMID: 33017899
- PMCID: PMC7538289
- DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040098.049
Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) training and education videos on YouTube.
Methods: This study was conducted in English language in descriptive type to evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of Internet videos related to CIC training. The search was performed by using term "clean intermittent catheterization" and "intermittent self catheterization" on YouTube in August 2019. The content of the selected videos was analyzed by 2 independent experts in the field. The DISCERN questionnaire was used to analyze the reliability of the video and the global quality score (GQS) was used for the quality of the video.
Results: When the contents of the 64 videos included in the study were examined, it was found that 41 of them contained useful information and 23 of them contained misleading information. DISCERN scores, video coverage scores, and GQS of videos with useful information were found to be statistically higher than those with misleading information (P<0.001). When the sources of the videos were examined, it was seen that 78.05% of the videos containing useful information were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies (P<0.001). The reliability scores, coverage scores, and GQS of the videos from medical advertisement/for-profit companies were significantly higher than the other sources (P<0.001).
Conclusion: In this study, it was seen that the majority of YouTube CIC training videos examined within the scope of the research were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies and most of these videos contain useful information.
Keywords: Clean intermittent catheterization; Reliability; Training; Usefulness; YouTube.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality.Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jan;53(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02620-w. Epub 2020 Aug 29. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 32860567
-
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30706318
-
Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19-Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 12;22(8):e20775. doi: 10.2196/20775. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32730221 Free PMC article.
-
The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment.J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;55:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 31. J Clin Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30075980 Review.
-
Health at work: a critical review of audiovisuals that address workplace exercise.Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020 Dec 11;18(2):203-208. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2020-585. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020. PMID: 33324462 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source.Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2403-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05932-y. Epub 2024 Sep 24. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. PMID: 39316112
-
Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Oct;111(10):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02026-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35471259 Free PMC article.
-
YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis.Rheumatol Int. 2021 Dec;41(12):2117-2123. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05009-9. Epub 2021 Sep 29. Rheumatol Int. 2021. PMID: 34590188
-
Suprapubic catheter change: Evaluating YouTube videos as a resource for teaching junior doctors.BJUI Compass. 2023 Oct 20;5(2):224-229. doi: 10.1002/bco2.299. eCollection 2024 Mar. BJUI Compass. 2023. PMID: 38371202 Free PMC article.
-
Insights Into Korean Public Perspectives on Urology: Online News Data Analytics Through Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling.Int Neurourol J. 2023 Nov;27(Suppl 2):S91-98. doi: 10.5213/inj.2346288.144. Epub 2023 Nov 30. Int Neurourol J. 2023. PMID: 38048823 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Newman DK, Willson MM. Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices. Urol Nurs. 2011;31:12-28, 48. - PubMed
-
- Silva DRA, Mazzo A, Jorge BM, Souza Júnior VD, Fumincelli L, Almeida RGS. Intermittent urinary catheterization: the impact of training on a low-fidelity simulator on the self-confidence of patients and caregivers. Rehabil Nurs. 2017;42:97–103. - PubMed
-
- Lauridsen S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, Geng V, Holroyd S, Lester M, et al., editors. European Association of Urology Nurses evidence-based guidelines for best practice in urological health care catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults dilatation, urethral intermittent in adults evidence-based guidelines for best practice in urological health care catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults dilatation, urethral intermittent in adults. ARNHEM (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2013.
-
- Mackay BJ, Anderson J, Harding T. Mobile technology in clinical teaching. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;22:1–6. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous