Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application
- PMID: 33017899
- PMCID: PMC7538289
- DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040098.049
Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) training and education videos on YouTube.
Methods: This study was conducted in English language in descriptive type to evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of Internet videos related to CIC training. The search was performed by using term "clean intermittent catheterization" and "intermittent self catheterization" on YouTube in August 2019. The content of the selected videos was analyzed by 2 independent experts in the field. The DISCERN questionnaire was used to analyze the reliability of the video and the global quality score (GQS) was used for the quality of the video.
Results: When the contents of the 64 videos included in the study were examined, it was found that 41 of them contained useful information and 23 of them contained misleading information. DISCERN scores, video coverage scores, and GQS of videos with useful information were found to be statistically higher than those with misleading information (P<0.001). When the sources of the videos were examined, it was seen that 78.05% of the videos containing useful information were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies (P<0.001). The reliability scores, coverage scores, and GQS of the videos from medical advertisement/for-profit companies were significantly higher than the other sources (P<0.001).
Conclusion: In this study, it was seen that the majority of YouTube CIC training videos examined within the scope of the research were published by medical advertisement/for-profit companies and most of these videos contain useful information.
Keywords: Clean intermittent catheterization; Reliability; Training; Usefulness; YouTube.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Newman DK, Willson MM. Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices. Urol Nurs. 2011;31:12-28, 48. - PubMed
-
- Silva DRA, Mazzo A, Jorge BM, Souza Júnior VD, Fumincelli L, Almeida RGS. Intermittent urinary catheterization: the impact of training on a low-fidelity simulator on the self-confidence of patients and caregivers. Rehabil Nurs. 2017;42:97–103. - PubMed
-
- Lauridsen S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, Geng V, Holroyd S, Lester M, et al., editors. European Association of Urology Nurses evidence-based guidelines for best practice in urological health care catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults dilatation, urethral intermittent in adults evidence-based guidelines for best practice in urological health care catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults dilatation, urethral intermittent in adults. ARNHEM (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2013.
-
- Mackay BJ, Anderson J, Harding T. Mobile technology in clinical teaching. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;22:1–6. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
