Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):1779.
doi: 10.3390/ani10101779.

Animal Welfare Management in a Digital World

Affiliations
Review

Animal Welfare Management in a Digital World

Henry Buller et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Although there now exists a wide range of policies, instruments and regulations, in Europe and increasingly beyond, to improve and safeguard the welfare of farmed animals, there remain persistent and significant welfare issues in virtually all types of animal production systems ranging from high prevalence of lameness to limited possibilities to express natural behaviours. Protocols and indicators, such as those provided by Welfare Quality, mean that animal welfare can nowadays be regularly measured and surveyed at the farm level. However, the digital revolution in agriculture opens possibilities to quantify animal welfare using multiple sensors and data analytics. This allows daily monitoring of animal welfare at the group and individual animal level, for example, by measuring changes in behaviour patterns or physiological parameters. The present paper explores the potential for developing innovations in digital technologies to improve the management of animal welfare at the farm, during transport or at slaughter. We conclude that the innovations in Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) offer significant opportunities for a more holistic, evidence-based approach to the monitoring and surveillance of farmed animal welfare. To date, the emphasis in much PLF technologies has been on animal health and productivity. This paper argues that this emphasis should not come to define welfare. What is now needed is a coming together of industry, scientists, food chain actors, policy-makers and NGOs to develop and use the promise of PLF for the creative and effective improvement of farmed animal welfare.

Keywords: animal welfare; precision livestock farming; welfare assurance; welfare management; welfare monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Puckett H.B. Mechanization of Livestock Production in the United States. BSAP Occas. Publ. 1980;2:191–204. doi: 10.1017/S0263967X00000380. - DOI
    1. Lunner-Kolstrup C., Hörndahl T., Karttunen J.P. Farm operators’ experiences of advanced technology and automation in Swedish agriculture: A pilot study. J. Agromed. 2018;23:215–226. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2018.1458670. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harrison R. Animal Machines: The New Factory Farming Industry. Vincent Stuart Publishers; London, UK: 1964.
    1. Hostiou N., Fagon J., Chauvat S., Turlot A., Kling-Eveillard F., Boivin X., Allain C. Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms. A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. 2017;21:268–275.
    1. Rotz S., Gravely E., Mosby I., Duncan E., Finnis E., Horgan M., LeBlanc J., Martin R., Neufeld H.T., Nixon A., et al. Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities. J. Rural Stud. 2019;68:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources