Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e036960.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036960.

Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jonathan Sen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Hypertension confers a poor prognosis in moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS), however, antihypertensive therapy (AHT) is often not prescribed due to the perceived deleterious effects of vasodilation and negative inotropes.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and grey literature were searched without language restrictions up to 9 September 2019.

Study eligibility criteria, appraisal and synthesis methods: Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments from a systematic search of observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing AHT with a placebo or no AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS for any parameter of efficacy and safety outcomes. Conflicts were resolved by the third reviewer. Meta-analysis with pooled effect sizes using random-effects model, were estimated in R.

Main outcome measures: Mortality, Left Ventricular (LV) Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and LV ejection fraction RESULTS: From 3025 publications, 31 studies (26 500 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 24 studies in the meta-analysis. AHT was not associated with mortality when all studies were pooled, but heterogeneity was substantial across studies. The effect size of AHT differed according to drug class. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) were associated with reduced risk of mortality (Pooled HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80, p=0.006), The differences in changes of haemodynamic or echocardiographic parameters from baseline with and without AHT did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: AHT appears safe, is well tolerated. RAASi were associated with clinical benefit in patients with moderate or severe AS.

Keywords: adult cardiology; hypertension; valvular heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from Australian Government Research Training Program (Research Scholarship) for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk-of-bias assessment of randomised controlled trials. Risk-of-bias summary (A) and graph (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the effect of antihypertensive therapies on all-cause mortality at follow-up. ACEi, ACE inhibitor; BB, beta-blockers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the effect of antihypertensive therapies on HR of all-cause mortality at follow-up. ACEi, ACE inhibitor; AS, aortic stenosis; RAAS, renin-angiotensin and aldosterone systems.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the effect of antihypertensive therapies on (A) change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) and (B) post-LVMI. RAAS, renin–angiotensin and aldosterone systems; SMD, standardised mean difference.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the effect of antihypertensive therapies on change in (A) systolic blood pressure and (B) diastolic blood pressure during follow-up. RAAS, renin-angiotensin and aldosterone systems; SMD, standardised mean difference.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of the effect of antihypertensive therapies on change in left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up. RAAS, renin–angiotensin and aldosterone systems; SMD, standardised mean difference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. . Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 2019;139:e56–28. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badiani S, van Zalen J, Treibel TA, et al. . Aortic stenosis, a left ventricular disease: insights from advanced imaging. Curr Cardiol Rep 2016;18:80. 10.1007/s11886-016-0753-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ito S, Miranda WR, Nkomo VT, et al. . Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:1313–21. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 1975;56:56–64. 10.1172/JCI108079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet 2009;373:956–66. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60211-7 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances