Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;12(3):262-269.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002284. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Feasibility and effectiveness of tools that support communication and decision making in life-prolonging treatments for patients in hospital: a systematic review

Affiliations

Feasibility and effectiveness of tools that support communication and decision making in life-prolonging treatments for patients in hospital: a systematic review

Maureen Thodé et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Patients with advanced diseases and frail older adults often face decisions regarding life-prolonging treatment. Our aim was to provide an overview of the feasibility and effectiveness of tools that support communication between healthcare professionals and patients regarding decisions on life-prolonging treatments in hospital settings.

Design: Systematic review: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (2009-2019) to identify studies that reported feasibility or effectiveness of tools that support communication about life-prolonging treatments in adult patients with advanced diseases or frail older adults in hospital settings. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality appraisal of the included studies.

Results: Seven studies were included, all involving patients with advanced cancer. The overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate to high. Five studies described question prompt lists (QPLs), either as a stand-alone tool or as part of a multifaceted programme; two studies described decision aids (DAs). All QPLs and one DA were considered feasible by both patients with advanced cancer and healthcare professionals. Two studies reported on the effectiveness of QPL use, revealing a decrease in patient anxiety and an increase in cues for discussing end-of-life care with physicians. The effectiveness of one DA was reported; it led to more understanding of the treatment in patients.

Conclusions: Use of QPLs or DAs, as a single intervention or part of a programme, may help in communicating about treatment options with patients, which is an important precondition for making informed decisions.

Keywords: communication; end of life care; quality of life; supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.

References

    1. Etkind SN, Bone AE, Gomes B, et al. . How many people will need palliative care in 2040? past trends, future projections and implications for services. BMC Med 2017;15:102. 10.1186/s12916-017-0860-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Montori VM. Shared decision making and the importance of time. JAMA 2019;322:25–6. 10.1001/jama.2019.3785 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shrestha A, Martin C, Burton M, et al. . Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Psychooncology 2019;28:1367–80. 10.1002/pon.5054 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff 2013;32:276–84. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein RM, Duberstein PR, Fenton JJ, et al. . Effect of a patient-centered communication intervention on oncologist-patient communication, quality of life, and health care utilization in advanced cancer: the voice randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:92–100. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4373 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types