Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 4;17(19):7259.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197259.

Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas

Affiliations

Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas

Ben Ma et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

There is growing interest in evaluating the effects of establishing protected areas (PAs). However, the mechanisms through which the establishment of PAs achieved significant positive effects remain unclear, and how different conservation mechanisms have achieved significant positive social and ecological benefits has also not been sufficiently studied. In this study, we systematically reviewed exemplary cases from Asia, Africa, and South America, using panel data to assess the conservation effectiveness of nature reserves and national parks. By surveying 629 literature samples reported in 31 studies, we found that the establishment of PAs has positive influences on poverty reduction, family incomes, household expenditure, employment, forest cover, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and a reduction in forest fragmentation. Furthermore, we analyzed the specific aspects that influence the publication of a paper in a high-impact journal. We found that publication is more likely when the research uses panel data, matching methods of data analysis, large samples, and plots or PAs as research units and has significant evaluation results. Our results suggest that future studies should use panel data and matching method analysis to assess the impacts of PAs from multiple perspectives and focus on the effectiveness of specific conservation mechanisms in achieving positive effects.

Keywords: conservation mechanism; ecological effects; protected area; social effects; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation indicator distribution of the social effects of protected areas by number and by percentage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation indicator distribution of the ecological effects of protected areas by number and by percentage.

References

    1. Oldekop J.A., Holmes G., Harris W.E., Evans K.L. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 2016;30:133–141. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12568. - DOI - PubMed
    1. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS . Protected Planet Report 2018. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS; Cambridge, UK: Gland, Switzerland: Washington, DC, USA: 2018.
    1. De Pourcq K., Thomas E., Arts B., Vranckx A., Léon-Sicard T., Van Damme P. Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Dev. 2017;93:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.026. - DOI
    1. Gilbert N. Can conservation cut poverty? Nature. 2010;467:264–265. doi: 10.1038/467264a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vedeld P., Jumane A., Wapalila G., Songorwa A. Protected areas, poverty and conflicts: A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. For. Pol. Econ. 2012;21:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.008. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources