Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Apr;91(4):546-552.
doi: 10.1111/ans.16338. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Utility of intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Evan Williams  1 , Swetha Prabhakaran  1 , Joseph C Kong  1   2   3 , Stephen Bell  1   4 , Satish K Warrier  1   2 , Paul Simpson  1   4 , Peter W G Carne  1   4 , Chip Farmer  1   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Utility of intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Evan Williams et al. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal resection leads to increased oncological and non-oncological, morbidity and mortality. Intra-operative assessment of a colorectal anastomosis with intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy (IOFS) has become increasingly prevalent and is an alternative to conventional air leak test. It is thought that intra-operative identification of an AL or anastomotic bleeding (AB) allows for immediate reparative intervention at the time of anastomosis formation itself. We aim to assess the available evidence for the use of IOFS to prevent complications following colorectal resection.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature between January 1980 and June 2020 was performed. Comparative studies assessing IOFS versus conventional air leak test were compared, and outcomes were pooled.

Results: A total of 4512 articles were assessed, of which eight were found to meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 1792 patients were compared; 884 in the IOFS arm and 908 in the control arm. IOFS was associated with an increase in the rate of positive leak test (odds ratio (OR) 5.21, P > 0.001), a decrease in AL (OR 0.45, P = 0.006) and a decrease in post-operative AB requiring intervention (OR 0.40, P = 0.037).

Conclusion: In a non-randomized meta-analysis, IOFS increases the likelihood of identifying an anastomotic defect or bleeding intra-operatively. This allows for immediate intervention that decreases the rate of AL and AB. This adds impetus for performing routine IOFS after a left-sided colorectal resection with anastomosis and highlights the need for randomized controlled trial to confirm the finding.

Keywords: anastomotic leak; colorectal anastomosis; flexible sigmoidoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis. Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 333-8.
    1. Caulfield H, Hyman NH. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148: 177-82.
    1. Riss S, Stremitzer S, Riss K, Mittlböck M, Bergmann M, Stift A. Pelvic organ function and quality of life after anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2011; 123: 53-7.
    1. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJFX et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 255-9.
    1. Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A, Kennedy RH, Faiz O. Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg. Endosc. 2014; 28: 2513-30.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources