Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 3;9(10):1403.
doi: 10.3390/foods9101403.

Proteomic Insights into the Biology of the Most Important Foodborne Parasites in Europe

Affiliations
Review

Proteomic Insights into the Biology of the Most Important Foodborne Parasites in Europe

Robert Stryiński et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Foodborne parasitoses compared with bacterial and viral-caused diseases seem to be neglected, and their unrecognition is a serious issue. Parasitic diseases transmitted by food are currently becoming more common. Constantly changing eating habits, new culinary trends, and easier access to food make foodborne parasites' transmission effortless, and the increase in the diagnosis of foodborne parasitic diseases in noted worldwide. This work presents the applications of numerous proteomic methods into the studies on foodborne parasites and their possible use in targeted diagnostics. Potential directions for the future are also provided.

Keywords: biomarker; food; foodborne parasite; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS); proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of two proteomic strategies in the studies of foodborne parasites (FBPs): discovery and targeted workflows. Red plus—positive detection (sample contaminated); green minus—negative detection (sample free); LC-MS/MS—liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; SRM/MRM/PRM—selected/multiple/parallel—reaction monitoring.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trevisan C., Torgerson P.R., Robertson L.J. Foodborne Parasites in Europe: Present Status and Future Trends. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35:695–703. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pozio E. How globalization and climate change could affect foodborne parasites. Exp. Parasitol. 2020;208:107807. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2019.107807. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dorny P., Praet N., Deckers N., Gabriel S. Emerging food-borne parasites. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;163:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murrell K.D. Zoonotic foodborne parasites and their surveillance. OIE Rev. Sci. Tech. 2013;32:559–569. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.2.2239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFSA and ECDC The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018;16 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources