Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 2;10(10):780.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100780.

The Elevated Pre-Treatment C-Reactive Protein Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Neo-Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy

Affiliations

The Elevated Pre-Treatment C-Reactive Protein Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Neo-Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy

Richard Partl et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of the pre-treatment C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma level with survival outcomes in a cohort of 423 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgical resection. To evaluate the prognostic value of the CRP level for clinical endpoints recurrence-free survival (RFS), local-regional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS), uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied, and survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median follow-up time was 73 months. In univariate analyses, the pre-treatment CRP level was a significant predictor of RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.015, 95% CI 1.006-1.023; p < 0.001), LC (HR 1.015, 95% CI 1.004-1.027; p = 0.009), MFS (HR 1.014, 95% CI 1.004-1.023; p = 0.004), and OS (HR 1.016, 95% CI 1.007-1.024; p < 0.001). Additionally, univariate analysis identified the MRI circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) and pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as significant predictor of RFS (HR 2.082, 95% CI 1.106-3.919; p = 0.023 and HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002-1.008; p < 0.001). Univariate analysis also revealed a significant association of the mrCRM (HR 2.089, 95% CI 1.052-4.147; p = 0.035) and CEA (HR 1.006, 95% CI 1.003-1.008; p < 0.001) with MFS. Age and CEA were prognostic factors for OS (HR 1.039, 95% CI 1.013-1.066; p = 0.003 and HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002-1.008; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis that included parameters with a p-level < 0.20 in univariate analysis, the pre-treatment CRP remained a significant prognostic factor for RFS (HR 1.013, 95%CI 1.001-1.025; p = 0.036), LC (HR 1.014, 95% CI 1.001-1.027; p = 0.031), and MFS (HR 1.013, 95% CI 1.000-1.027; p = 0.046). The results support the hypothesis that an elevated pre-treatment CRP level is a predictor of poor outcome. If confirmed by additional studies, this easily measurable biomarker could contribute to the identification of patients who might be candidates for more aggressive local or systemic treatment approaches or the administration of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Keywords: C-reactive protein (CRP); biomarker; inflammation; locally advanced rectal cancer; neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy; outcome; prognostic factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for (A) recurrence-free survival, (B), loco-regional control, (C) metastases-free survival, and (D) overall survival, categorized by the pre-treatment CRP level. Abbreviation: CRP, C- reactive protein.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for (A) recurrence-free survival, (B), loco-regional control, (C) metastases-free survival, and (D) overall survival, categorized by the pre-treatment CRP level. Abbreviation: CRP, C- reactive protein.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saad El Din K., Loree J.M., Sayre E.C., Gill S., Brown C.J., Dau H., De Vera M.A. Trends in the epidemiology of young-onset colorectal cancer: A worldwide systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:288. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06766-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stoffel E.M., Murphy C.C. Epidemiology and Mechanisms of the Increasing Incidence of Colon and Rectal Cancers in Young Adults. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:341–353. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glynne-Jones R., Wyrwicz L., Tiret E., Brown G., Rodel C., Cervantes A., Arnold D., Committee E.G. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:iv22–iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benson A.B., Venook A.P., Al-Hawary M.M., Cederquist L., Chen Y.J., Ciombor K.K., Cohen S., Cooper H.S., Deming D., Engstrom P.F., et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2018;16:874–901. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sauer R., Becker H., Hohenberger W., Rodel C., Wittekind C., Fietkau R., Martus P., Tschmelitsch J., Hager E., Hess C.F., et al. German Rectal Cancer Study, G., Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:1731–1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. - DOI - PubMed