Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Mar;106(2):211-214.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319792. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)

Christian Achim Maiwald et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is increasingly used. We investigated the feasibility of a new LISA-device (Neofact®) in neonates.

Design: Prospective observational pilot study with open-label LISA in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units.

Patients: 20 infants with a gestational age of ≥26+0/7 weeks and an indication for LISA (Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)≥5 or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30). Infants with respiratory tract malformations or unavailability of an instructed neonatologist were excluded.

Main outcome measures: Success of LISA, defined as laryngoscopy-confirmed intratracheal catheter position or a decrease in FiO2 by ≥0.05 or to 0.21, accompanied by an RSS decrease of ≥2; number of attempts needed for tracheal catheterisation.

Results: 20/57 screened infants were enrolled. Successful application occurred in 19/20 (95%). One application failed after three attempts. No device-related adverse events occurred. The median number of attempts was 2, success rate per attempt 19/31 (61%).

Conclusion: LISA via Neofact® appears feasible.

Keywords: neonatology; resuscitation; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CAM has a financial relationship in the profits of the product as an inventor. The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surfactant application device (Neofact®).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient flow.

References

    1. Klotz D, Porcaro U, Fleck T, et al. . European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration—a survey. Eur J Pediatr 2017;176:147–54. 10.1007/s00431-016-2812-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herting E, Härtel C, Göpel W. Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions. Curr Opin Pediatr 2020;32:228–34. 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000878 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maiwald CA, Neuberger P, Vochem M, et al. . QuickSF: a new technique in surfactant administration. Neonatology 2017;111:211–3. 10.1159/000450823 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McAdams RM, Hedstrom AB, DiBlasi RM, et al. . Implementation of bubble CPAP in a rural Ugandan neonatal ICU. Respir Care 2015;60:437–45. 10.4187/respcare.03438 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, et al. . Minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013;98:F122–6. 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301314 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances